IMPLEMENTING LESSON PLAN DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES  FOR HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS IN RESPONSE TO EVALUATION CRITERIA

Ngô Trọng Tuệ

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.11561

IMPLEMENTING LESSON PLAN DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES FOR HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS IN RESPONSE TO EVALUATION CRITERIA

About this article

Received: 15/11/24 Revised: 31/03/25 Published: 31/03/25

Authors

Ngo Trong Tue , Hanoi Pedagogical University 2

Abstract

The assessment of lesson plans based on set criteria, as outlined for high schools, aims to standardize evaluation and ranking methods for lesson planning. Therefore, research on constructing lesson plans aligned with evaluation criteria is essential to guide the activities involved in developing lesson plans. The purpose of this study is to identify the activities and outputs for each activity in constructing lesson plans, thereby clarifying the specific steps for high school physics lesson planning. The theoretical research method is used to synthesize and analyze documents to determine the key elements within lesson plans, the criteria for evaluating them, and to identify the outputs for each activity in building a high school physics lesson plan. The research results outline the methods for defining objectives, selecting content, utilizing teaching materials, designing activity sequences, applying teaching methods and techniques, and planning assessment strategies. These findings assist students and teachers in developing lesson plans that meet general requirements, thereby contributing to improved quality in high school physics education.

Keywords

Lesson planning; Physics; Lesson plan development activities; Evaluation; Activity outputs

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] T. N. Nguyen, “Fostering the competency of planning outdoor activities of primary school teachers contributing to achieving the requirements of 2018 general education program,” Vietnam Journal of Education, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 35-39, 2022.

[2] T. T. H. Phan, “Exploring guidelines on lesson planning of the New South Wales, Australia,” Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 20, no. 03, pp. 75-80, 2024.

[3] T. D. Truong. T. H. L. Thai, and T. M. H. Nguyen, “Designing lesson plan for Quadratic equations with one unknown (Math 9) in the orientation of mathematical competence for students,” Vietnam Journal of Education, vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 11-15, 2023.

[4] T. T. H. Phan, “Lesson planning - experience from Singapore,” Vietnam Journal of Education, vol. 19, no. 04, pp. 76-80, 2023.

[5] T. L. Kieu, M. N. Tran, T. T. H. Dang, T. T. H. Doan, B. H. Tran, T. T. Phan, and Q. N. Le, “International experience in building teaching plan under blended learning model and recommendations for Vietnam,” Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 20, no. 01, pp. 73-80, 2024.

[6] Ministry of Education and Training, Official Dispatch No. 5555/BGDĐT-GDTrH on Guidelines for professional activities on innovation of teaching methods and testing and assessment; rganization and management of professional activities of the high school, pp. 3, 2014.

[7] Minister of Education and Training, Appendix 5, Official Dispatch No. 5512/BGDĐT– GDTrH on Building and organizing the implementation of the school’s educational plans, pp. 2-4, 2020

[8] V. B. Nguyen and T. T. K. Nguyen, “Utilizing the decision tree to develop the instrument for assessing the competencebased lesson plan,” HNUE Journal of Science Educational Sciences, vol. 69, no.1, pp. 193-203, 2024.

[9] R.C. Mshra, Lesson Plan, APH Publishing, 2008, pp. 2 – 12.

[10] Minister of Education and Training, Physics subject - General education program issued with Circular 32/2018/TT-BGDDT, 2018, pp. 31-32.

[11] Minister of Education and Training, Appendix 4, Official Dispatch No. 5512/BGDĐT-GDTrH on Building and organizing the implementation of the school’s educational plans, 2020, pp. 1-3.

[12] S. Roberts, Blended Learning Lesson Plans. New Readers Press, 2020, p. 3.

[13] L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl et al., A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, New York: Longman, 2021, p. 67.

[14] J. Biggs and K. Collis, Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy, New York: Academic Press, 1982, p. 28.

[15] S. D. Hall-Ellis and D. S. Grealy, “The Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition: A Career Development Framework for Succession Planning and Management in Academic Libraries,” College & Research Libraries, vol. 74, no. 6, p. 597, 2013.

[16] Center for Teaching Excellence (University of Waterloo), “Selecting and Organizing Course Content”. [Online]. Available: https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/catalogs/tip-sheets/selecting-and-organizing-course-content. [Accessed October 30, 2024].

[17] T. T. Ngo, T. P. L. Nguyen, A. L. Nguyen, and T. Q. P. Luong, “Transformation in the application of information technology in teaching high school physics,” HPU2 Journal of Science, vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 230-236, 2024.

[18] T. T. Ngo and T. P. L. Nguyen, “Using computer simulation to illustrate the results of physics problems at high school,” Journal of Education Equipment, vol. 3, no. 311, pp. 121-124, 2024.

[19] Minister of Education and Training, Official Dispatch No. 8773/BGDĐT-GDTrH on Guidelines on designing tests, 2010, p. 3.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.11561

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me