Chia sẻ bài báo qua Email THÁCH THỨC TRONG SỬ DỤNG TRÍ TUỆ NHÂN TẠO Ở TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC
Thông tin bài báo
Ngày nhận bài: 06/11/25 Ngày hoàn thiện: 30/12/25 Ngày đăng: 30/12/25Các tác giả
Nguyễn Danh Nam
, Đại học Thái Nguyên
Tóm tắt
Trí tuệ nhân tạo đang được sử dụng ngày càng phổ biến trong dạy và học ở các trường đại học trên thế giới. Tuy nhiên, các nghiên cứu chỉ ra rằng còn nhiều thách thức trong sử dụng trí tuệ nhân tạo ở trường đại học. Do đó, nghiên cứu này nhằm mục đích tìm hiểu những thách thức chính trong sử dụng trí tuệ nhân tạo ở các trường đại học ở Việt Nam. Tác giả sử dụng phương pháp nghiên cứu tài liệu thứ cấp và phương pháp phỏng vấn chuyên gia. Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy có 6 nhóm thách thức chủ yếu liên quan đến tính chính trực và gian lận học thuật, sự phụ thuộc và giảm năng lực tư duy, bất bình đẳng kỹ thuật số, thông tin sai lệch, đạo đức và thể chế trí tuệ nhân tạo, thiết kế và đánh giá các công cụ trí tuệ nhân tạo. Từ đó, bài viết đưa ra một số giải pháp thúc đẩy giáo dục số và tích hợp trí tuệ nhân tạo để đổi mới mô hình giảng dạy, đảm bảo trí tuệ nhân tạo được sử dụng hiệu quả và có đạo đức trong trường đại học.
Từ khóa
Toàn văn:
PDFTài liệu tham khảo
[1] A. Ghimire and J. Edwards, “From guidelines to governance: A study of AI policies in education,” arXiv:2403.15601, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.15601.
[2] N. McDonald, A. Johri, A. Ali, and A. Hingle, “Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional and policies guidelines,” arXiv:2402.01659, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.01659.
[3] T. Adıgüzel, M. H. Kaya, and F. K. Cansu, “Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, 2023, Art. no. 4ep429, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13152.
[4] L. Yan, L. Sha, L. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Martinez-Maldonado, G. Chen, X. Li, Y. Jin, and D. Gašević, “Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, pp. 90-112, 2024, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13370.
[5] M. Farrokhnia, S. K. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and A. Wals, “A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 460-474, 2023.
[6] J. Borenstein and A. Howard, “Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education,” AI and Ethics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61-65, 2021.
[7] A. Kostas, V. Paraschou, D. Spanos, F. Tzortzoglou, and A. Sofos, “AI and ChatGPT in Higher Education: Greek Students’ Perceived Practices, Benefits, and Challenges,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, 2025, Art. no. 605, doi: 10.3390/educsci15050605.
[8] L. Yan, L. Sha, L. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Martinez-Maldonado, G. Chen, X. Li, Y. Jin, and D. Gašević, “Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, pp. 90-112, 2024, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13370.
[9] D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228-239, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
[10] G.-J. Hwang and N.-S. Chen, “Editorial position paper: Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in education: Applications, challenges, and future research directions,” Educational Technology and Society, vol. 26, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.30191/ETS.202304_26(2).0014.
[11] UNESCO, “ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ChatGPT-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_EN_FINAL.pdf. [Accessed Oct. 10, 2025].
[12] J. Heil, D. Ifenthaler, M. Cooper et al., “Students’ perceived impact of GenAI tools on learning and assessment in higher education: the role of individual AI competence,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 12, 2025, Art. no. 37, doi: 10.1186/s40561-025-00395-0.
[13] M. A. Khan, A. Rehman, A. A. Shah et al., “Navigating the future of higher education in Saudi Arabia: implementing AI, machine learning, and big data for sustainable university development,” Discover Sustainability, vol. 6, 2025, Art. no. 495, doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-01388-2.
[14] I. El mourabit, S. Jai Andaloussi, O. Ouchetto, and M. Miyara, “AI Chatbots in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges for Personalized and Mobile Learning,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 19-37, 2025, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v19i12.54163.
[15] G. Attwell, G. Bekiaridis, L. Deitmer, M. Perini, S. Roppertz, and V. Tutlys, “Artificial intelligence in policies, processes and practices of vocational education and training,” Institute of Technology and Education, Research Reports 71, 2020, doi: 10.26092/elib/307.
[16] D. Long and B. Magerko, “What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations,” Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1-16, doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376727.
[17] A. A. Tubella, M. Mora-Cantallops, and J. C. Nieves, “How to teach responsible AI in Higher Education: challenges and opportunities,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 26, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10676-023-09733-7.
[18] Z. Papamitsiou, M. Filippakis, M. Poulou, D. G. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, and M. Giannakos, “Towards an educational data literacy framework: Enhancing the profiles of instructional designers and e-tutors of online and blended courses with new competences,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 8, no. 18, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40561-021-00163-w.
[19] J. Luo, C. Zheng, J. Yin et al., “Design and assessment of AI-based learning tools in higher education: a systematic review,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 22, 2025, Art. no. 42, doi: 10.1186/s41239-025-00540-2.
[20] Y. Dai, A. Liu, and C. P. Lim, “Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 119, pp. 84-90, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002.
[21] Y. An, J. H. Yu, and S. James, “Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 22, 2025, Art. no. 10, doi: 10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3.
[22] P. Lara-Navarra, A. Ferrer-Sapena, E. Ismodes-Cascón, C. Fosca-Pastor, and E. A. Sánchez-Pérez, “The Future of Higher Education: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities in AI-Driven Lifelong Learning in Peru,” Information, vol. 16, 2025, Art. no. 224, doi: 10.3390/info16030224.
[23] S. Kim, Y. Jang, W. Kim, S. Choi, H. Jung, S. Kim, and H. Kim, “Why and what to teach: AI curriculum for elementary school,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, no. 35, pp. 15569–15576, 2021, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17833.
[24] T. S. Sanusi, S. A. Olaleye, S. O. Oyelere, and R. A. Dixon, “Investigating learners’ competencies for artificial intelligence education in an African K-12 setting,” Computer and Open Education, vol. 3, 2022, Art. no. 100083, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100083.
[25] J. Delcker, J. Heil, D. Ifenthaler, S. Seufert, and L. Spirgi, “First-year students AI-competence as a predictor for intended and de facto use of AI-tools for supporting learning processes in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, 2024, Art. no. 18, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00452-7.
[26] C. K. Chan and W. Hu, “Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, Art. no. 43, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.
[27] J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan, “ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?,” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 342–363, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.
[28] M. Sullivan, A. Kelly, and P. McLaughlan, “ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning,” Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31-40, 2023, doi: 0.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17.
[29] D. Dalalah and O. M. A. Dalalah, “The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 2, 2023, Art. no. 100822, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100822.
[30] L. Kohnke, B. L. Moorhouse, and D. Zou, “ChatGPT for language teaching and learning,” RELC Journal, vol. 54, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1177/00336882231162868.
[31] J. M. Lodge, K. Thompson, and L. Corrin, “Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2023, doi: 10.14742/ajet.8695.
[32] C. K. Y. Chan and K. K. W. Lee, “The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, 2023, Art. no. 60, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3.
[33] A. Darvishi, H. Khosravi, S. Sadiq, D. Gašević, and G. Siemens, “Impact of AI assistance on student agency,” Computers & Education, vol. 210, 2023, Art. no. 104967, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967.
[34] J. Wang and W. Fan, “The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, 2025, Art. no. 621, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y.
[35] D. Schiff, “Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 32, pp. 527-563, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2.
[36] W. Holmes, K. Porayska-Pomsta, K. Holstein, E. Sutherland, T. Baker, S. B. Shum, O. C. Santos, M. T. Rodrigo, M. Cukurova, I. I. Bittencourt, and K. R. Koedinger, “Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 32, pp. 504-526, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.
[37] J. Almarode and K. Vandas, Clarity for learning: Five essential practices that empower students and teachers. Corwin, 2019.
[38] G. Dall’Alba, “The role of teaching in higher education: Enabling students to enter a field of study and practice,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 299-313, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(93)90021-Q.
[39] M. Bond, H. Khosravi, M. De Laat, N. Bergdahl, V. Negrea, E. Oxley, P. Pham, S. W. Chong, and G. Siemens, “A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z.
[40] B. Edwards, “Why AI detectors think US Constitution was written by AI,” Ars Technica, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/why-ai-detectors-think-the-us-constitution-was-written-by-ai/. [Accessed Oct. 10, 2025].
[41] B. L. Moorhouse, M. A. Yeo, and Y. Wan, “Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities,” Computers and Education Open, vol. 5, 2023, Art. no. 100151, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.13960
Các bài báo tham chiếu
- Hiện tại không có bài báo tham chiếu