ROLE OF CUSTOMER-CENTRIC APPROACH AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION ON INNOVATION AMBIDEXTERITY OF SMES IN VIETNAM | Ngân | TNU Journal of Science and Technology

ROLE OF CUSTOMER-CENTRIC APPROACH AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION ON INNOVATION AMBIDEXTERITY OF SMES IN VIETNAM

About this article

Received: 11/12/24                Revised: 27/03/25                Published: 28/03/25

Authors

1. Mac Thuy Ngan, Foreign Trade University
2. Nguyen Thi Hanh Email to author, Foreign Trade University
3. Tran To Quyen, Foreign Trade University
4. Duong Huong Giang, Foreign Trade University
5. Trinh Thi Tieu Mai, Foreign Trade University
6. Phan Ha Le, Foreign Trade University

Abstract


This study examines the impact of a customer-centric approach and entrepreneurial orientation on innovation ambidexterity in Vietnamese small and medium enterprises. Although research on innovation ambidexterity has primarily focused on large firms, studies addressing the unique challenges small and medium enterprises face in balancing explorative and exploitative innovation, especially within the Vietnamese context remain limited. Using PLS-SEM analysis on data from 142 small and medium enterprises managers and team leaders, the findings reveal that both customer-centricity and entrepreneurial orientation positively influence ambidextrous innovation. Additionally, entrepreneurial orientation mediates this relationship, helping small and medium enterprises address both emerging and current market demands. This research enriches the literature of innovation ambidexterity by applying the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capability Theory to small and medium enterprises in a developing market and offers practical managerial implications for these firms.

Keywords


Customer-centric approach; Entrepreneurial orientation; Innovation ambidexterity; Small and medium enterprises; PLS-SEM

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] A. Čirjevskis, “Sustainability in information and communication technologies' industry: Innovative ambidexterity and dynamic capabilities perspectives,”
Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 211-226, 2016.

[2] S. Berraies and S. Zine El Abidine, “Do leadership styles promote ambidextrous innovation? Case of knowledge-intensive firms,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 836-859, 2019.

[3] Y. Y. Chang and M. Hughes, “Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms,” European Management Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2012.

[4] S. Raisch and J. Birkinshaw, “Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators,” Journal of Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 375-409, 2008.

[5] H. Tian, C. S. K. Dogbe, W. W. K. Pomegbe, S. A. Sarsah, and C. O. A. Otoo, “Organizational learning ambidexterity and openness, as determinants of SMEs' innovation performance,” European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 414-438, 2021.

[6] L. Selden and I. C. MacMillan, “Manage customer-centric innovation-systematically,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 84, no. 4, 2006, Art.no. 108.

[7] A. T. Bon and E. M. A. Mustafa, “The Impacts of Customer Focus on Innovation in Service Organizations,” Journal of Engineering and Technology (JET), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57-68, 2014.

[8] Z. Yaacob, “The direct and indirect effects of customer focus on performance in public firms,” International Journal for Quality Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 265-276, 2014.

[9] I. I. Wiratmadja, W. B. Profityo, and A. A. Rumanti, “Drivers of innovation ambidexterity on small medium enterprises (SMEs) performance,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 4423-4434, 2020.

[10] I. Kowalik and A. Pleśniak, “Marketing determinants of innovation ambidexterity in small and medium‐sized manufacturers,” Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 163-185, 2022.

[11] L. V. Ngo, T. Bucic, A. Sinha, and V. N. Lu, “Effective sense-and-respond strategies: Mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovation,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 94, pp. 154-161, 2019.

[12] S. Tuominen, H. Reijonen, G. Nagy, A. Buratti, and T. Laukkanen, “Customer-centric strategy driving innovativeness and business growth in international markets,” International Marketing Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 479-496, 2022.

[13] J. A. Zhang, F. Edgar, A. Geare, and C. O'Kane, “The interactive effects of entrepreneurial orientation and capability-based HRM on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 59, pp. 131-143, 2016.

[14] M. Chen, Z. Yang, W. Dou, and F. Wang, “Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 35, pp. 97-119, 2018.

[15] J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance,” Long Range Planning, vol. 46, no. 1-2, pp. 1-12, 2013.

[16] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39-50, 1981.

[17] J. F. Hair Jr, L. M. Matthews, R. L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use,” International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107-123, 2017.

[18] R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, 1986, Art. no. 1173.

[19] P. E. Shrout and N. Bolger, “Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations,” Psychological Methods, vol. 7, no. 4, 2002, Art. no. 422.

[20] G. G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin, “The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship,” Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 147-156, 2005.

[21] T. Kollmann and C. Stöckmann, “Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1001-1026, 2014.

[22] J. Wiklund and D. Shepherd, “Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 79-103, 2005.

[23] G. T. Lumpkin and G. G. Dess, “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 135-172, 1996.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.11679

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
TNU Journal of Science and Technology
Rooms 408, 409 - Administration Building - Thai Nguyen University
Tan Thinh Ward - Thai Nguyen City
Phone: (+84) 208 3840 288 - E-mail: jst@tnu.edu.vn
Based on Open Journal Systems
©2018 All Rights Reserved