Email this article SUBPROBLEM FORMULATIONS BASED ON MAGNETIC FIELD AND SCALAR POTENTIAL VECTORS FOR CORRECTING THIN SHELL MODELS
About this article
Received: 09/11/20 Revised: 28/11/20 Published: 30/11/20Authors
1. Dang Quoc Vuong
, Hanoi University of Science and Technology2. Bui Minh Dinh, Hanoi University of Science and Technology
Abstract
The propose of this paper is based on subproblem formulations with a magnetic field and scalar potentials to compute and simulate the distribution of fields (magnetic fields, magnetic scalar potentials, eddy currents and Joule power losses) appearing from thin shell models, where it is somewhat difficult to use directly finite element method formulations. The scenario of the method is to couple subproblems in two steps: A subproblem consisting of the stranded inductor and thin shell model is first considered. The following subproblem with actual volumes (including one or two conductive regions) is added to improve errors near edges and corners of the thin shell models. All the steps are independently performed with different meshes and domains, which facilitates meshing and reduces computation time for each sequence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1]. S. Koruglu, P. Sergeant, R. V. Sabarieqo, V. Q. Dang, and M. De Wulf, “Influence of contact resistance on shielding efficiency of shielding gutters for high-voltage cables,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 715-720, 2011.
[2]. V. Q. Dang, P. Dular, R. V. Sabariego, L. Krähenbühl, and C. Geuzaine, “Subproblem approach for Thin Shell Dual Finite Element Formulations,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 407-410, 2012.
[3]. P. Dular, V. Q. Dang, R. V. Sabariego, L. Krähenbühl, and C. Geuzaine, “Correction of thin shell finite element magnetic models via a subproblem method,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 158-161, 2011.
[4]. Velasco, F. Henrotte, and C. Geuzaine, "Finite-Element Modeling of Thin Conductors in Frequency Domain," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1-4, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2019.2955514.
[5]. Q. V. Dang, “Improved error of electromagnetic shielding problems by a two-process coupling subproblem technique,” Science & Technology Development Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 524-527, 2020, doi: 10.32508/stdj.v23i2.2054.
[6]. V. Q. Dang, P. Dular, R. V. Sabariego, L. Krähenbühl, and C. Geuzaine, “Subproblem Approach for Modelding Multiply Connected Thin Regions with an h-Conformal Magnetodynamic Finite Element Formulation,” EPJ AP., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 24516p1-24516p7, 2013.
[7]. Q. V. Vuong, “Robust Correction Procedure for Accurate Thin Shell Models via a Perturbation Technique,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 5832-5836, 2020.
[8]. Q. V. Dang, “Modeling of Magnetic fields and Eddy current losses in Electromagnetic Screens by a Subproblem Method”, TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 192, no. 16, pp. 7-12, 2018.
[9]. G. Kovacs, and M. Kuczmann, Solution of the TEAM workshop problem No.7 by the finite Element Method, International Compumag Society Board, 2011, pp. 1-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.3767
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.