ENHANCING EXAMINATION SKILLS FOR STUDENTS IN MARXIST – LENINIST PHILOSOPHY OPEN-BOOK-EXAM OF TNU  - UNIVERSITY OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Hoàng Ngọc Bích

ENHANCING EXAMINATION SKILLS FOR STUDENTS IN MARXIST – LENINIST PHILOSOPHY OPEN-BOOK-EXAM OF TNU - UNIVERSITY OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

About this article

Received: 21/12/20 Revised: 23/01/21 Published: 30/04/21

Authors

Hoang Ngoc Bich , NU - University of Information and Communication Technology

Abstract

TNU - University of Communication and Information Technology has been applying the form of essay writing exam, allowing students to use materials when doing the Marxist – Leninist Philosophy exam. This article aimed to clarify the requirements of essay writing and propose some measures to help students improve their skills and do well in exams. This article used the combination of the analytical method, logical method, assement method and historical method. The research results show that the Philosophy essay test not only meets the general requirements of a science test, but also meets the specific requirements associated with the subject: logical thinking, creative thinking and social abilities. Statistics on final exams of Marxist-Leninist philosophy of 200 random students in 2019-2020 academic year showed that the percentage of students got mark A, B, C, D and F was 14.5%, 33.4%, 32.9%, 15.1% and 4.1% respectively. Thus, many students’s essays met requirements limited to some extent; even some did not meet requirements, which could have negative impacts on the university’s training quality and students’ psychology when studying the other subjects. Therefore, it is necessary to improve students’ exam-taking skills by further promoting the role of lecturers in supporting students determine the requirements of the test; improve students’ exam review efficiency and exam presentation skills.

Keywords

Education; Skills; Exam; Documents; Marxist – Leninist Philosophy

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] T. D. Vuong, and T. V. H. Nguyen, The method for answering revision question of Marxist–Leninist Philosophy: theory, essay, and multichoice test. National Economics University Publishing House, Hanoi, 2007.

[2] D. B. Nguyen, “The combination of the historical method and logical method in researching history of philosophy,” (in Vietnamese), Institute of Philosophy, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 277, no. 6, pp. 42-49, 2014.

[3] T. H. V. Nguyen, M. S. Do, and T. N. Tran, Guidebook to learn Marxist–Leninist Philosophy. Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology Publishing House, 2010.

[4] T. K. Nguyen, “The meaning of Marxist–Leninist Philosophy in building socialism in Vietnam today,” Summary report for the topic at Ministry level, Institute of Philosophy, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, 2007.

[5] M. Nghiem, “Duc Luan Nguyen: Students who learn philosophy well can study other subjects easily”, Academy of Journalism & Communication Portal, 25/9/2013. [Online]. Available: https://ajc.hcma.vn/ Pages/nghien-cuu-khoa-hoc.aspx?CateID=679&ItemID=3554. [Accessed Dec. 21, 2020].

[6] P. V, “Innovate education and training basically and totally according to Resolution 29 NQ/TW,” Communist Party of Vietnam Review, 22/06/2020. [Online]. Available: https://dangcongsan.vn/huong-toi-ky-niem-90-nam-ngay-truyen-thong-nganh-tuyen-giao/thong-tin-tu-lieu/doi-moi-can-ban-toan-dien-giao-duc-va-dao-tao-theo-nghi-quyet-29-nq-tw-557483.html. [Accessed Dec. 21, 2020].

[7] T. H. Nguyen, “Theoretical basis of logical thinking competency in scientific research,” (in Vietnamese), Vietnam Journal of Education, Spesial Issue of July, pp. 180-184, 2019.

[8] V. H. Nguyen, “Training creative thinking for grade 10 students in teaching Geometry”, Master thesis, Thai Nguyen University of Education, 2018.

[9] K. Mac, Ph. Engels full set, episode 3, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 1995.

[10] T. H. Dang, “Social capacity in general education,” (in Vietnamese), Journal of Education Sciences, The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences, Vol. 70, pp. 1-3, 2011.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me