TEACHERS’ AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF MOBILE – ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING IN ENHANCING LEARNERS’ ENGLISH VOCABULARY AT A HIGH SCHOOL IN VIETNAM
About this article
Received: 16/05/22                Revised: 14/06/22                Published: 14/06/22Abstract
This paper intends to highlight a 21st - century educational shift: the advent of Mobile – Assisted Language Learning (MALL) as a new language learning approach. The main focus is on how high school students in Quang Ninh province update themselves by using mobile technology to support their English language level, particularly in terms of vocabulary acquisition. It also tries to figure out how students learn a language by using mobile devices, and understand more about how teachers and students apply mobile technology in their daily practice. In order to investigate the use of MALL in English language teaching, a questionnaire for students and an interview for teachers were used to collect data. The study used experimental investigation method. The collected data presents that both teachers and students agreed that mobile devices were good tools for improving vocabulary knowledge. The value of MALL vocabulary activities were demonstrated to have a favorable impact on students’ English achievement by assisting them in various courses. The teachers were also aware of the usefulness of mobile devices as new educational instruments for teaching various language abilities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] J. W. Creswell and D. L. Miller, “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry,” Theory into Practice, vol. 39, pp. 124-130, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.scirp.org/(S(lz5mqp453ed%20snp 55rrgjct55))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=1564553. [Accessed October 20, 2021].
[2] J. Abedi and J. L. Herman, “Assessing English language learners’ opportunity to learn mathematics: issues and limitations,” Teachers College Record, vol. 112, pp. 723-746, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203181287.ch3. [Accessed October 20, 2021].
[3] N. M. Diab, “Effects of peer-editing versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts,” System, vol. 38, pp. 85-95, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.iiis.org/cds 2010/cd2010sci/ispr_2010/paperspdf/va909up.pdf. [Accessed October 20, 2021].
[4] J. Mukundan, V. Nimehchisalem, and R. Hajimohammadi, “Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist: A focus group study,” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 100-105, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Developing-an-English-Language-Textbook-Evaluation-Mukundan-Nimehchisalem/c8269e94e4e12f800c60ba9ef5
884a0d4d25b9e5. [Accessed October 15, 2021].
[5] R. Wakabayashi, “The Effects of the Peer Feedback Process on Reviewers’ Own Writing,” Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 117-192, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://academypublication.com/issues2/tpls/vol05/11/08.pdf. [Accessed October 10, 2021].
[6] Y. M. Kalman, G. Kavé, and D. Umanski, “Writing in a Digital World: Self-Correction While Typing in Younger and Older Adults,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 12723-12734, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/32348781/ The_Effect_of_Mobile_Phone_Applications_on_Improving_EFL_Learners_Self-editing. [Accessed January 20, 2022].
[7] G. Stockwell and P. Hubbard, “Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning,” Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning. [Accessed September 27, 2021].
[8] K. E. Valarmathi, “Mobile-assisted language learning,” Journal of Technology for ELT, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://sites.google.com/site/journaloftechnologyforelt/archive/april2011/mobileassisted languagelearning. [Accessed September 27, 2021].
[9] A. Kukulska-Hulme and L. Shield, “An overview of mobile-assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction,” Recall, 2008b, doi: 10.1017/S0958344008000335. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/recall /article/abs/an-overview-of-mobile -assisted-language-learning-from-content-delivery-to-supported-collaboration-and-interaction/55FE8 FC0F278B5A2E55A8501F059F14C. [Accessed November 12, 2021].
[10] M. Sharples (Ed.), “Big issues in mobile learning,” Technology-Enhanced Learning, Principles and Products. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 233–249, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://oro.open.ac.uk/31416/. [Accessed December 12, 2021].
[11] Y. Mehdipour and H. Zerehkafi, “Mobile Learning for Education: Benefits and Challenges,” International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 93-101, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijceronline.com/papers/Vol3_issue6/part%203/P03630930100.pdf. [Accessed November 10, 2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.5997
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.





