ASSESSMENT OF ANTAGONISTIC ACTIVITY AGAINST Phytophthora palmivora OF BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM DURIAN RHIZOSPHERE SOIL

Nguyễn Thị Liên; Lê Nguyễn Quỳnh Nga; Kim Tuấn Kiệt; Lê Thị Cẩm Tiên; Liễu Bảo Trâm; Nguyễn Tăng Phú

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.8499

ASSESSMENT OF ANTAGONISTIC ACTIVITY AGAINST Phytophthora palmivora OF BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM DURIAN RHIZOSPHERE SOIL

About this article

Received: 06/08/23 Revised: 28/09/23 Published: 28/09/23

Authors

1. Nguyen Thi Lien , Institute of Food and Biotechnology - Can Tho University
2. Le Nguyen Quynh Nga, Institute of Food and Biotechnology - Can Tho University
3. Kim Tuan Kiet, Institute of Food and Biotechnology - Can Tho University
4. Le Thi Cam Tien, Institute of Food and Biotechnology - Can Tho University
5. Lieu Bao Tram, Institute of Food and Biotechnology - Can Tho University
6. Nguyen Tang Phu, Institute of Food and Biotechnology - Can Tho University

Abstract

Phytophthora palmivora can damage durians at various stages of development, and cause serious losses in yield and product value. The study aimed to select strains of rhizobacteria capable of inhibiting P. palmivora, and evaluate their antagonistic properties. The antagonistic activity of bacteria was carried out by the co-culture method. The ability to produce cellulase, protease, and siderophore of antagonistic bacteria strains was evaluated under in vitro conditions. Eighteen isolates exhibited inhibitory activity against P. palmivora, with growth inhibition percentages ranging from 36.5 - 59.7%. Cellulase, protease, and siderophore activities differed among the isolates. The ability to produce cellulase was positively correlated with the antagonistic ability of the isolates. The CT7 strain with the highest growth inhibition percentage against P. palmivora was identified as Bacillus siamensis. This study indicated the potential of using rhizosphere bacteria as the biological control agents in durian cultivation.

Keywords

Bacillus siamensis; Cellulase; Durian; Phytophthora palmivora; Rhizobacteria

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] D. Tilman, M. Clark, D. R. Williams, K. Kimmel, S. Polasky, and C. Packer, “Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention,” Nature, vol. 546, no. 7656, pp. 73-81, 2017.

[2] M. Boro, S. Sannyasi, D. Chettri, and A. K. Verma, “Microorganisms in biological control strategies to manage microbial plant pathogens: a review,” Archives of microbiology, vol. 204, no. 11, p. 666, 2022.

[3] A. Sentis, J. L. Hemptinne, A. Magro, and Y. Outreman, “Biological control needs evolutionary perspectives of ecological interactions,” Evolutionary applications, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1537-1554, 2022.

[4] P. A. O'Brien, N. Williams, and G. E. Hardy, “Detecting Phytophthora,” Critical reviews in microbiology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 169-181, 2009.

[5] L. P. Kroon, H. Brouwer, A. W. de Cock, and F. Govers, “The genus Phytophthora anno 2012,” Phytopathology, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 348-364, 2012.

[6] G. A. Torres, G. A. Sarria, G. Martinez, F. Varon, A. Drenth, and D. I. Guest, “Bud Rot Caused by Phytophthora palmivora: A Destructive Emerging Disease of Oil Palm,” Phytopathology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 320-329, 2016.

[7] O. S. Olanrewaju, A. S. Ayangbenro, B. R. Glick, and O. O. Babalola, “Plant health: feedback effect of root exudates-rhizobiome interactions,” Applied microbiology and biotechnology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 1155-1166, 2019.

[8] M. Meena, P. Swapnil, K. Divyanshu, S. Kumar, Harish, Y. N. Tripathi, A. Zehra, A. Marwal, and R. S. Upadhyay, “PGPR-mediated induction of systemic resistance and physiochemical alterations in plants against the pathogens: Current perspectives,” Journal of basic microbiology, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 828-861, 2020.

[9] J. H. Han, H. Shim, J. H. Shin, and K. S. Kim, “Antagonistic Activities of Bacillus spp. Strains Isolated from Tidal Flat Sediment Towards Anthracnose Pathogens Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides in South Korea,” The plant pathology journal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 165-175, 2015.

[10] H. O. W. Eggins and G. J. F. Pugh, “Isolation of cellulose decomposing fungi from the soil,” Nature, vol. 193, pp. 94-95, 1962.

[11] P. Saroj, P. Manasa, and K. Narasimhulu, “Characterization of thermophilic fungi producing extracellular lignocellulolytic enzymes for lignocellulosic hydrolysis under solid-state fermentation,” Bioresources and Bioprocessing, vol. 5, p. 31, 2018.

[12] L. P. Geok, C. N. A. Razak, R. N. Z. A. Rahman, M. Basri, and A. B. Salleh, “Isolation and screening of an extracellular organic solvent-tolerant protease producer,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73-77, 2003.

[13] B. Schwyn and J. B. Neilands, “Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores,” Analytical biochemistry, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 47-56, 1987.

[14] W. P. Chen and T. T. Kuo, “A simple and rapid method for the preparation of Gram-negative bacterial genomic DNA,” Nucleic acids research, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 2260, 1993.

[15] D. J. Lane, “16S/23S rRNA sequencing,” in Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics, E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow, Eds, New York: Wiley, 1991, pp. 115-175.

[16] H. S. Judelson and F. A. Blanco, “The spores of Phytophthora: weapons of the plant destroyer,” Nature reviews. Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47-58, 2005.

[17] L. Lin, Z. Yang, M. Tao, D. Shen, C. Cui, P. Wang, L. Wang, M. Jing, G. Qian, and X. Shao, “Lysobacter enzymogenes prevents Phytophthora infection by inhibiting pathogen growth and eliciting plant immune responses,” Frontiers in plant science, vol. 14, p. 1116147, 2023.

[18] M. K. Sang, A. Shrestha, D. Y. Kim, K. Park, C. H. Pak, and K. D. Kim, “Biocontrol of Phytophthora Blight and Anthracnose in Pepper by Sequentially Selected Antagonistic Rhizobacteria against Phytophthora capsici,” The Plant Pathology Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 154–167, 2013.

[19] M. De Vrieze, R. Gloor, J. M. Codina, S. Torriani, K. Gindro, F. L'Haridon, A. Bailly, and L. Weisskopf, “Biocontrol Activity of Three Pseudomonas in a Newly Assembled Collection of Phytophthora infestans Isolates,” Phytopathology, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 1555-1565, 2019.

[20] J. Zhang, X. Huang, Y. Hou, X. Xia, Z. Zhu, A. Huang, S. Feng, P. Li, L. Shi, and P. Dong, “Isolation and Screening of Antagonistic Endophytes against Phytophthora infestans and Preliminary Exploration on Anti-oomycete Mechanism of Bacillus velezensis 6-5,” Plants (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 4, p. 909, 2023.

[21] M. Admassie, Y. Woldehawariat, and T. Alemu, “In Vitro Evaluation of Extracellular Enzyme Activity and Its Biocontrol Efficacy of Bacterial Isolates from Pepper Plants for the Management of Phytophthora capsici,” BioMed research international, vol. 2022, p. 6778352, 2022.

[22] M. Thines, “Oomycetes,” Current Biology, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 812-813, 2018.

[23] V. Braun, and K. Hantke, “Recent insights into iron import by bacteria,” Current opinion in chemical biology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 328-334, 2011.

[24] B. R. Park, H. J. Son, J. H. Park, E. S. Kim, S. J. Heo, H. R. Youn, Y. M. Koo, A. Y. Heo, H. W. Choi, M. K. Sang, S. W. Lee, S. H. Choi, and J. K. Hong, “Chemical Fungicides and Bacillus siamensis H30-3 against Fungal and Oomycete Pathogens Causing Soil-Borne Strawberry Diseases,” The Plant Pathology Journal, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 79-85, 2021.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.8499

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me