AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL LIVE DEBATES  BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN:  A CASE STUDY OF GRICE’S COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE

Nguyễn Trọng Du; Dương Khánh Linh

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.9971

AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL LIVE DEBATES BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN: A CASE STUDY OF GRICE’S COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE

About this article

Received: 26/03/24 Revised: 05/06/24 Published: 05/06/24

Authors

1. Nguyen Trong Du , TNU - Center for Testing and Quality Management in Education
2. Duong Khanh Linh, Iris Primary, Lower Secondary and Upper Secondary School, Thai Nguyen

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a study conducted with the aim of identifying the non-observance of Grice’s (1975) Cooperative Principle and finding out the underlying motives for this non-observance by two American presidential candidates namely Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee, and Donald Trump, the nominee of the Republican Party. The data were collected from two downloaded videos of the presidential debates in 2020, and were then categorized and analysed using Grice's Cooperative Principle. The findings show that both Biden and Trump did not observe all the maxims, in which the rate of violation is much higher than that of flouting, and Trump more frequently failed to adhere to the maxims than Biden. The maxims of quantity and relation were the most frequently broken, whilst the maxim of manner was the most frequently observed. In conclusion, Donald Trump and Joe Biden consistently failed to observe Grice's conversational maxims and took use of this non-observance to portray themselves favorably and the other unfavorably in an effort to gain the audience's support.

Keywords

Grice’s Cooperative Principle; Conversational maxims; American presidential debates; Violating; Flouting

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] History.com, “History,” March 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/kennedy-nixon-debates. [Accessed March 15, 2024].

[2] P. Grice, Logic and Conversation. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

[3] M. Hossain, “The Application of Grice Maxims in Conversation: A Pragmatic Study,” Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 32-40, 2021.

[4] Y. Joyce, “The Principles Underlying What is Communicated and not Said: A Cursory Discussion of Grice’s Cooperative Principle and its Maxims,” Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 10-17, 2021.

[5] K. E. Sidabutar and M. Johan, “Grice’s Types of maxims in ‘Willoughbhys’ Movie,” Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 326-337, 2022.

[6] A. Rasool, T. Zahra, and Z. Khawa, “An Investigation of Grice’s Cooperative Principle in an Interview with Ishaq Dar: A Pragmatic Analysis,” Kashmir Journal of Language Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-21, 2022.

[7] I. Al-Qaderi and A. Alduais, “The cooperative principle in political discourse: flouting Gricean maxims in Modern Standard Arabic political speeches,” Research Result, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 3-13, 2019.

[8] N. A. Laila, “Cooperative Principles in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Debate: Grice’s Maxims Analysis,” Applied Linguistics Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14-22, 2019.

[9] A. Benoit, “A Functional Analysis of the 2006 Canadian and 2007 Australian Election Debates,” Argumentation & Advocacy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 36-48, 2007.

[10] N. H. Kartika, A pragmatic analysis of Grice’s maxims in Clinton-Obama democrats presidential debate. Indonesia University of Education, Bandung, 2009.

[11] A. Khoirunisa and R. N. Indah, “Argumentative Statements in the 2016 Presidential Debates of the U.S: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” JEELS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155-173, 2017.

[12] N. Q. Nguyen and M. H. M. Sawalmeh, “Trump's Strategies in the First Presidential Debate: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 68-77, 2020.

[13] T. Sartika, “Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s and Joe Biden’s Language in Use in the 2020 United States Presidential Debates,” Conference proceeding of the 1^st International Conference on Education of Suryankanacana, 2021, pp. 412-417.

[14] S. W. Vanderstoep and D. D. Johnston, Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.

[15] Nytimes.com, “New York Times”. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000007365697/presidential-debate-live.html. [Accessed March 15, 2024].

[16] J . Cutting, Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge, 2002.

[17] J. Thomas, Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Routledge, 2013.

[18] businessinsider.com, “Business Insider,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.com /fact-check-of-first-trump-biden-2020-presidential-debate-live-2020-9. [Accessed March 15, 2024].

[19] A. Benoit and Harthcock, “Functions of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates,” Communication Monographs, vol. 66, pp. 341-357, 1999.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.9971

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me