A METHOD TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS FOR BRAIN TUMOR DETECTION ON MRI IMAGES | Tùng | TNU Journal of Science and Technology

A METHOD TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS FOR BRAIN TUMOR DETECTION ON MRI IMAGES

About this article

Received: 03/03/25                Revised: 05/06/25                Published: 05/06/25

Authors

1. Dinh Cong Tung Email to author, University of Transport and Communications
2. Mai Duc Vinh, University of Transport and Communications
3. Le Dang Son, University of Transport and Communications

Abstract


This paper proposes a preprocessing method to enhance the accuracy of deep learning models in detecting and classifying brain tumors on magnetic resonance imaging scans. First, the input images are processed using a Gabor filter to highlight essential features, including edges, textures, and directional structures of the brain, thereby improving the ability to recognize the morphological characteristics of tumors. Next, since magnetic resonance images are often affected by noise during acquisition, the denoising autoencoder technique is applied to remove noise and enhance image quality. Finally, the deep learning model VGG16 is employed to classify four common types of brain tumors: no tumor, glioma, meningioma, and pituitary tumor. Experiments conducted on a large dataset with thousands of magnetic resonance images demonstrate that the proposed method improves model accuracy to 96.68%, outperforming traditional approaches. These results confirm the potential of deep learning in the early diagnosis and classification of brain diseases, contributing to advancements in modern medical support systems.

Keywords


MRI; Brain tumor; Gabor; DAE; VGG16

References


[1] S. Sarkar, A. Kumar, S. Chakraborty, S. Aich, J. S. Sim, and H. C. Kim, “A CNN-based approach for the detection of brain tumor using MRI scans,” Test Eng. Manag., vol. 83, pp. 16580–16586, Bhubaneswar, India, May 2020.

[2] H. S. Nogay and H. Adeli, “Multiple classification of brain MRI autism spectrum disorder by age and gender using deep learning,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 48, no. 15, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-02032-0.

[3] J. Chaki and M. Woźniak, “A deep learning-based four-fold approach to classify brain MRI: BTSCNet,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 85, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104902.

[4] O. Özkaraca, O. İ. Bağrıaçık, H. Gürüler, F. Khan, J. Hussain, J. Khan, and U. Laila, “Multiple brain tumor classification with dense CNN architecture using brain MRI images,” Life, vol. 13, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.3390/life13020349.

[5] E. Avsar and K. Salcin, “Detection and classification of brain tumors from MRI images using Faster R-CNN,” Tehnicki Glasnik, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 337–342, Dec. 2019.

[6] S. Saeedi, S. Rezayi, H. Keshavarz, and S. R. N. Kalhori, “MRI-based brain tumor detection using convolutional deep learning methods and chosen machine learning techniques,” BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., vol. 23, no. 16, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02114-6.

[7] S. Das, O. F. M. R. R. Aranya, and N. N. Labiba, “Brain tumor classification using convolutional neural network,” in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Adv. Sci. Eng. Robot. Technol. (ICASERT), Dhaka, Bangladesh, May 2019, pp.1-5.

[8] K. M. V. Hespen, J. J. M. Zwanenburg, J. W. Dankbaar, et al., “An anomaly detection approach to identify chronic brain infarcts on MRI,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 7714, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87013-4.

[9] H. M. Rai, K. Chatterjee, and S. Dashkevich, “Automatic and accurate abnormality detection from brain MR images using a novel hybrid UnetResNext-50 deep CNN model,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 66, 2021, Art. no. 102477.

[10] N. Arunkumar, M. A. Mohammed, S. A. Mostafa, D. A. Ibrahim, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, and V. H. C. Albuquerque, “Fully automatic model-based segmentation and classification approach for MRI brain tumor using artificial neural networks,” Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp., vol. 32, no. 1, Jan. 2020, Art. no. e4962.

[11] R. Mehrotra, K. R. Namuduri, et al., “Gabor filter-based edge detection,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 25, pp. 1479–1494, 1992.

[12] P. Vincent, H. Larochelle, Y. Bengio, and P. A. Manzagol, “Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders,” in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2008, pp. 307–314, doi: 10.1145/1390156.1390294.

[13] J. G. Daugman et al., “Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 1160–1169, 1985.

[14] M. Nickparvar, “Brain Tumor MRI Dataset,” Kaggle, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/dsv/2645886. [Accessed October 23, 2024].

[15] C. W. Cleverdon, “Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems,” Aslib Cranfield Research Project, 1966.

[16] C. J. V. Rijsbergen, Information Retrieval, 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1979.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.12185

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
TNU Journal of Science and Technology
Rooms 408, 409 - Administration Building - Thai Nguyen University
Tan Thinh Ward - Thai Nguyen City
Phone: (+84) 208 3840 288 - E-mail: jst@tnu.edu.vn
Based on Open Journal Systems
©2018 All Rights Reserved