COMMUNICATIVENESS OF ACTIVITIES IN PRIMARY ENGLISH CLASSROOMS AMID CURRICULUM REFORM IN VIETNAM
About this article
Received: 09/10/24                Revised: 10/02/25                Published: 11/02/25Abstract
This study investigated the degree of communicativeness in activities conducted in primary English classes, along with the factors influencing their communicative nature. Nine teachers from eight primary schools in a Mekong Delta province, representing urban, semi-rural, and rural settings, participated in the study. Classroom observations and semi-structured interviews were employed, with Littlewood’s (2004) communicative continuum serving as the framework for analyzing activities across 27 video-recorded lessons and corresponding field notes. The findings indicated that most activities exhibited low levels of communicativeness, with urban teachers implementing more communicative activities than their semi-rural and rural counterparts. Teachers across all settings identified exam pressures, large class sizes, varying student proficiency levels, and limited time for communicative practice as major barriers. The study highlights the need to increase teachers and curriculum developers’ awareness of communicative approaches and recommends professional development initiatives to address these challenges in primary English classrooms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] Y. G. Butler, “The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region,” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 31, pp. 36-57, 2011.
[2] W. Littlewood, “Communicative language teaching: an expanding concept for a changing world,” in Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, E. Hinkel, Ed., vol. 2. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011, pp. 541-557.
[3] D. Nunan, “The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 589-613, 2003.
[4] G. N. Tran, X. V. Ha, and N. H. Tran, “EFL reformed curriculum in Vietnam: An understanding of teachers’ cognitions and classroom practices,” RELC Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 166-182, 2023.
[5] C. D. Nguyen, “The construction of age-appropriate pedagogies for young learners of English in primary schools,” The Language Learning Journal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 13-26, 2018.
[6] C. Deng and D. R. Carless, “The communicativeness of activities in a task-based innovation in Guangdong, China,” Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, vol. 19, pp. 113-134, 2009.
[7] Q. Chen and C. Wright, “Contextualization and authenticity in TBLT: Voices from Chinese classrooms,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 517-538, 2017.
[8] H. Dao and J. Newton, “TBLT perspectives on teaching from an EFL textbook at a Vietnam university,” Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 99-126, 2021.
[9] W. Littlewood, “The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions,” ELT Journal, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 319-326, 2004.
[10] D. R. Carless, “Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools,” System, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 485-500, 2003.
[11] T. M. Duong and T. T. H. Nguyen, “Implementing Task-Based Language Teaching in Vietnamese Secondary Schools: What Hinders EFL Teachers?” TESL-EJ, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1-15, 2021.
[12] N. Spada and M. Fröhlich, “COLT - Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching Observation Scheme: Coding Conventions and Applications,” Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University, 1995.
[13] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 77-101, 2006.
[14] D. C. Nguyen, T. L. Le, H. Q. Tran, and T. H. Nguyen, “Inequality of Access to English Language Learning in Primary Education in Vietnam: A Case Study,” In Equality in Education: Fairness and Inclusion, H. Zhang, P. W. K. Chan, and C. Boyle, Eds., Sense Publishers, 2014, pp. 139-153.
[15] Ariatna and R. Ellis, “A case study of one teacher’s introduction to task-based language teaching: Insights for the development of a professional development program,” Language Teaching for Young Learners, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 137-158, 2021.DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.11270
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.





