A REVIEW ON THE APPLICATION OF SENSE RELATIONS  IN TEACHING VOCABULARY

La Thị Hoàng Lan; Nguyễn Thúy Anh

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.13075

A REVIEW ON THE APPLICATION OF SENSE RELATIONS IN TEACHING VOCABULARY

About this article

Received: 17/06/25 Revised: 30/06/25 Published: 30/06/25

Authors

1. La Thi Hoang Lan , TNU - School of Foreign Languages
2. Nguyen Thuy Anh, TNU - School of Foreign Languages

Abstract

This paper critically reviews previous empirical studies on the application of sense relations in vocabulary instruction to highlight gaps and minimally addressed issues, providing directions for future research within the Vietnamese context. Employing a systematic literature review methodology, approximately 10 relevant publications, including journal articles, dissertations, and conference proceedings, were rigorously selected and analyzed. The findings demonstrate that sense-relation approaches (synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, collocations) often result in significant improvements in lexical knowledge, retention, and productive usage compared to traditional vocabulary instruction methods. However, some studies have indicated potential drawbacks, such as cognitive overload and short-term interference, when semantic groupings are excessively dense. Notably, the review also identifies substantial methodological limitations across the literature, including reliance on single-instrument measures, small and homogeneous sample sizes, and a predominant focus on theoretical or textbook analyses lacking empirical validation. Moreover, the scarcity of research specifically conducted in Vietnamese educational settings further underscores the urgent need for large-scale, longitudinal, mixed-method investigations. Consequently, future research should explicitly address these methodological and contextual shortcomings to effectively determine how sense-relations pedagogy can best support vocabulary development among Vietnamese learners of English as a foreign language.

Keywords

Sense relations; Vocabulary instruction; English Language Teaching (ELT); English as a Foreign Language; Systematic Literature Review

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] S. Thornbury, How to Teach Vocabulary, Harlow, UK: Pearson Education, 2002, p. 13.

[2] M. S. Ag, W. O. Janggo, and M. Yumelking, “An analysis of students’ difficulties in learning vocabulary at secondary school in Muhamadiyah Waipare Maumere,” Langua: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 28–40, 2024.

[3] A. S. Rosyada and T. W. Apoko, “Investigating English vocabulary difficulties and its learning strategies of lower secondary school students,” Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 489–501, 2023.

[4] A. Haque, M. R. Ariansyah, N. C. Wiladyah, and R. N. Sari, “Teaching vocabulary in a digital era: A study on tools and techniques for engaging English learners,” IREELL: Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 225–245, 2024.

[5] J. I. Saeed, Semantics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

[6] C. Kreidler, Introducing English Semantics. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2002, p. 46.

[7] J. R. Hurford, B. Heasley, and M. B. Smith, Semantics: A Coursebook. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 25.

[8] T. T. Nghiem, “Using sense relations in teaching vocabulary for English language learners,” Journal of Educational Equipment: Applied Research, vol. 2, no. 319, pp. 58–60, 2024.

[9] I. S. P. Nation, Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 126–132.

[10] T. H. Le, “Vocabulary learning strategy use among EFL university students in Vietnam,” Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences & Humanities, vol. 127, no. 6B, pp. 19–27, 2018.

[11] F. M. Al-Khawaldeh, R. A. Abu-Khattab, and R. S. Al-Momani, “Developing EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Repertoire Through Semantic Relations Techniques,” Language and Education, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 2024, doi: 10.1177/0265659020925875.

[12] K. White, “The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary in Semantic Groups: A Study in the Russian Language Classroom,” Russian Language Journal, vol. 65, no. 1, 2015, doi:10.70163/0036-0252.1103.

[13] Y. Zeng, L.-J. Kuo, L. Chen, J.-A. Lin, and H. Shen, “Vocabulary Instruction for English Learners: A Systematic Review Connecting Theories, Research, and Practices,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 262, Feb. 2025, doi:10.3390/educsci15030262.

[14] P. Ranganathan and R. Aggarwal, “Study designs: Part 7 – Systematic reviews,” Perspectives in Clinical Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 97–100, Apr.–Jun. 2020, doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_84_20.

[15] B. A. Kitchenham, “Systematic reviews,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, Chicago, IL, USA, 2004, pp. xii–xiii, doi: 10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357885.

[16] G. Kim, “How to perform and write a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Child Health Nursing Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 161–167, 2023, doi: 10.4094/chnr.2023.29.3.161.

[17] D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and the PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 336–341, 2010.

[18] Z. Wang, “The application of semantic field theory in vocabulary learning,” Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 29–40, 2023.

[19] G. Jian, “Sense relations and the applications in English vocabulary teaching,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatization in Education, Management and Business (IEMB’14), 2014, pp. 389–393.

[20] X. Cheng, “A study on lexical sense relations from the perspective of vocabulary breadth and word frequency,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 988–993, 2016.

[21] G. Zhang, “An experimental study on constructing sense relations in vocabulary teaching,” Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 123–128, 2009, doi: 10.4156/jcit.vol4.issue4.18.

[22] N. N. Al-Khawaldeh et al., “Developing EFL learners’ vocabulary repertoire through semantic relations techniques,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2552–2562, 2024.

[23] W. Cao, “Vocabulary teaching based on semantic-field,” Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 64–70, 2016, doi: 10.5539/jel.v5n3p64.

[24] A. Jashari, “Sense relation in vocabulary acquisition,” International Journal of Education Teacher, vol. 27, pp. 6–16, 2024, doi: 10.20544/teacher.27.01.

[25] İ. H. Erten and M. Tekin, “Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets,” System, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 407–422, 2008.

[26] S. M. A. Nekah, E. Akhlaghi, and S. Ebrahimi, “An assessment of lexical sense relations based on word association test,” European Scientific Journal, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 383–388, 2013.

[27] M. Winiharti, “Sense relations in language learning,” Humaniora, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 100–106, 2010.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.13075

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me