Email this article STUDY TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF OSPF MULTI AREA DISTRIBUTION ON IPV4 VS IPV6
About this article
Received: 07/12/21 Revised: 19/04/22 Published: 21/04/22Authors
1. Le Hoang Hiep
, TNU - University of Information and Communication Technology2. Tran Duy Minh, TNU - University of Information and Communication Technology
Abstract
In this paper, we focus on studying the performance of the route distribution process using the OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) multi-area protocol on IPv4 network infrastructure compared to IPv6. The study is carried out through simulation experiments with specific input data such as using the same network diagram template, the same number of network nodes and how to implement the same OSPF multi-area protocol on both infrastructures network to find quantifiable output information. The results of the study show that the performance of the route distribution process in the multi-zone OSPF running environment on IPv6 is more optimal than on IPv4 such as: The latency of IPv4 packets is always 1.2 to 1.6 times higher than IPv6's. In the case of a segment of the network that is disconnected, both IPv4 and IPv6 lose from 7 to 9 packets, the loss rate is similar or sometimes the packet loss rate of IPv6 is slightly higher than IPv4. The reliability of both IPv4 and IPv6 is the same at 100%, which means there are no input errors nor output errors. Data transfer time on IPv6 is nearly 28 to nearly 34 times faster than IPv4’s.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Tiếng Việt)References
[1] M. Thomas, OSPF Network Design Solutions, Cisco Press, 2010.
[2] N. Z. Rashid and M. R. Moghal, Loop Problem Solving in Route Redist.of Routg.Proto.EGRIP,OSPF UsgGNS3, LAP LAMBERT, 2017.
[3] N. Kocharians, CCIE Routing and Switching v5.1 Foundations: Bridging the Gap Between CCNP and CCIE, Pearson India, 2018.
[4] M. Haddad, OSPF on Huawei with LABS: Master OSPF Routing Protocol on Huawei products by covering topics from Entry to Advanced level, Kindle Edition, 2021.
[5] S. T. Chandel and S. Sharma, “Performance Evaluation of IPv4 and IPv6 Routing Protocols on Wired, Wireless and Hybrid Networks,” International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 57-62, 2016.
[6] H. H. Le et al., “Study the impacts of route summarization on the performance of OSPFv3 and EIGRPv6 in hybrid IPV4-IPV6 network,” Dalat University Journal of Science, vol. 6, pp. 77-89, 2019.
[7] H. H. Le et al., “Network design of IPv6 safety based on analysis, feature assessment of IPv6 protocol,” TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 188, no. 12, pp. 85-91, 2018.
[8] H. H. Le et al., "Study the impacts of Bandwidth and delay to performance of EIGRP in IPv4 and IPv6 network," TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 204, no. 11, pp. 31-38, 2019.
[9] D. Chauhan and S. Sharma, “Performance Evaluation of Different Routing Protocols in IPv4 and IPv6 Networks on the basis of Packet Sizes,” Procedia computer science, vol. 46, pp. 1072-1078, 2015.
[10] H. H. Le et al., "Study the method of implementation of Border Gateway Protocol on IPv4 and IPv6 infrastructure by analysis and evaluate of some properties affecting protocol performance," TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 226, no. 11, pp. 149-157, 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.5238
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.