Email this article MODELLING OF EDDY CURRENT LOSSES BASED ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF MAGNETIC VECTOR POTENTIAL FORMULATIONS
About this article
Received: 09/02/22 Revised: 19/04/22 Published: 21/04/22Authors
1. Bui Duc Hung, Hanoi University of Science and Technology2. Dang Quoc Vuong
, Hanoi University of Science and Technology
Abstract
Eddy currents always appear in any conduction regions of all types electrical devices, such as electrical apparatus, the cores of transformers, rotating electrical machines, which are subjected to a time-varying magnetic field variation. This leads to an increase of losses and a descrease of efficiency for electrical devices. However, in other fields, it has the effect of detecting break-downs, such as cracks occuring in metal pipes under the seabed or through mountains, or magnetic inductions, or induction furnaces. In the recent years, many papers have been devoted to the finite element method for solving this problem related to eddy currents in conducting regions. In this litterature, a new finite element method is presented with the development of magnetic vector potential formulations to compute and simulate local fields, such as the magnetic field, magnetic flux density and eddy current losses of magnetodynamic problems. The developed method is validated via a practical problem.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] H. De Gersem, S. Vanaverbeke, and G. Samaey, “Three-dimensional-two-dimensional coupled model for eddy currents in laminated iron cores,” IEEETrans. Magn., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 815-818, 2012.
[2] P. Rasilo, E. Dlala, K. Fonteyn, et al., “Model of laminated ferromagneticcores for loss prediction in electrical machines,” IET Electr. Power Appl., vol. 5, no. 7, p. 580, 2011.
[3] S. Frljić and B. Trkulja, “Two-step method for calculation of eddycurrent losses in a laminated transformer core,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 14, no.9, pp.1577-1583, 2020.
[4] Q. V. Vuong and C. Geuzaine “Using edge elements for modeling of 3-D Magnetodynamic Problem via a Subproblem Method,” Sci. Tech. Dev. J., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 439-445, 2020.
[5] M. E. Royak, I. M. Stupakov and N. S. Kondratyeva, “Coupled vector FEM and scalar BEM formulation for eddy current problems,” 2016 13th International Scientific-Technical Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering (APEIE), Novosibirsk, 2016, pp. 330-335.
[6] Q. V. Vuong and C. Geuzaine, “Two-way coupling of thin shell finite element magnetic models via an iterative subproblem method,” COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1085-1097, 2020, doi: 10.1108/COMPEL-01-2020-0035.
[7] S. Koruglu, P. Sergeant, R. V. Sabarieqo, Q. V. Dang, and M. De Wulf, “Influence of contact resistance on shielding efficiency of shielding gutters for high-voltage cables,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 5, no.9, pp. 715-720, 2011.
[8] I. Ziger, B. Trkulja, and Z. Stih, “Determination of Core Losses in Open-Core Power Voltage Transformers,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 29426-29435, 2018.
[9] K. Hollaus and J. Schöberl, “Multi-scale FEM and magnetic vector potential A for 3D eddy currents in laminated media,” COMPEL Int.J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 34, pp. 1598-1608, 2015.
[10] Q. Phan, G. Meunier, O. Chadebec, J. Guichon, and B. Bannwarth, "BEM-FEM formulation based on magnetic vector and scalar potentials for eddy current problems," 2019 19th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ISEF), 2019, pp. 1-2, doi: 10.1109/ISEF45929.2019.9096899.DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.5517
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.