PROPOSE A METHOD TO FIND THE MAXIMUM POWER GENERATOR OF PV SYSTEM BASED ON ISC AND VOC VALUE FORECAST

Trương Việt Anh; Bùi Văn Hiền; Nguyễn Tùng Linh; Nguyễn Vũ Lân; Quách Thanh Hải

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.6088

PROPOSE A METHOD TO FIND THE MAXIMUM POWER GENERATOR OF PV SYSTEM BASED ON ISC AND VOC VALUE FORECAST

About this article

Received: 31/05/22 Revised: 14/07/22 Published: 14/07/22

Authors

1. Truong Viet Anh, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education
2. Bui Van Hien, 1) Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, 2) School of Engineering and Technology, Van Lang University
3. Nguyen Tung Linh , Electric Power University
4. Nguyen Vu Lan, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education
5. Quach Thanh Hai, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education

Abstract

The maximum power point (MPP) of the photovoltaic cell system is related to the value of the open-circuit voltage (V_oc) and the short-circuit current (I_sc) according to the fill factor. Consequently, knowing these two parameters will be able to approximate the optimal working position of the system. This can significantly reduce the search area for Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) solutions to increase convergence speed and performance. The content of this paper introduces a solution that applies two parameters V_oc and I_sc combined with the traditional perturbation and observation (P&O) algorithm to solve the above problem. The proposed solution is simulated in a PSIM environment to compare the performance and speed of MPPT with the traditional P&O algorithm under the same experimental operating conditions. The obtained results show that it has faster convergence speed, higher efficiency, and stable output waveform compared to the unimproved solution.

Keywords

Photovoltaic cell; Algorithm P&O; PV Parallel; Open circuit voltage; Maximum Power Point Tracker

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] V. R. Kota and M. N. Bhukya, “A novel linear tangents based P&O scheme for MPPT of a PV system,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 71, pp. 257-267, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.054.

[2] M. H. Zafar, N. M. Khan, A. F. Mirza, and M. Mansoor, “Bio-inspired optimization algorithms based maximum power point tracking technique for photovoltaic systems under partial shading and complex partial shading conditions,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 309, August 2021, Art. no. 127279, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127279.

[3] F. Belhachat and C. Larbes, “A review of global maximum power point tracking techniques of photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 92, pp. 513-553, September 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.094.

[4] A. O. Baba, G. Liu, and X. Chen, “Classification and Evaluation Review of Maximum Power Point Tracking Methods,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 19, no. 4, pp.433-443, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100020.

[5] R. John, S. S. Mohammed, and R. Zachariah, “Variable step size Perturb and observe MPPT algorithm for standalone solar photovoltaic system,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Srivilliputtur, India 2017, doi: 10.1109/ITCOSP.2017.8303163.

[6] M. E. Başoğlu and B. Çakır, “Hybrid global maximum power point tracking approach for photovoltaic power optimisers,” IET renewable Power Generation, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 875-882, June 2018, doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.0029.

[7] Y. Wang, Y. Li, and X. Ruan, “High Accuracy and Fast Speed MPPT Methods for PV String Under Partially Shaded Conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 235-245, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2465897.

[8] H. M. A. Alhussain and N. Yasin, “Modeling and simulation of solar PV module for comparison of two MPPT algorithms (P&O & INC) in MATLAB/Simulink,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 666-677, May 2020, doi: 10.11591/ ijeecs.v18.i2.pp666-677.

[9] R. ‑H. Josean, U. Irantzu, M. O.‑G. Jose, F.‑G. Unai, M. Amaia and Z. Ekaitz, “Temperature based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic modules,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, 2020, Art. no. 12476, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69365-5.

[10] S. Vijayalekshmy, S. Rama Iyer, and B. Beevi, “Comparative Analysis on the Performance of a Short String of Series-Connected and Parallel-Connected Photovoltaic Array Under Partial Shading,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India), Series B, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 217-226, January 2014, doi: 10.1007/s40031-014-0143-7.

[11] A. D. Martina, J. R. Vazqueza, and J. M. Cano, “MPPT in PV systems under partial shading conditions using artiﬁcial vision,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 162, pp. 89-98, September 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2018.05.005.

[12] B. Yang, T. Zhu, Y. Wang, H. Shu, T. Yu, X. Zhang, W. Yao, and L. Sun, “Comprehensive overview of maximum power point tracking algorithms of PV systems under partial shading condition,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 268, pp. 121983-122002, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121983.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.6088

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me