BUILDING AND ASSESSING A RESEARCH MODEL OF COMMUNICATION JOURNALISM ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM POLICIES  IN VIETNAM

Hà Thị Thu Hương

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.6945

BUILDING AND ASSESSING A RESEARCH MODEL OF COMMUNICATION JOURNALISM ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM POLICIES IN VIETNAM

About this article

Received: 18/11/22 Revised: 28/11/22 Published: 28/11/22

Authors

Ha Thi Thu Huong , Hanoi University of Home Affairs

Abstract

The objective of this study is to test the reliability and significance of a research model of communication journalism on public administrative reform policies in Vietnam. The model was built on the basis of expert consultation and previous studies in the world. The survey tool was built using a 5-point likert scale, convenient sampling method, 260 samples of 4 subjects including journalists, officials and civil servants, business, citizen. The tests included reliability analysis of the scale (Cronbach Alpha), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and parallel structural equation model analysis (SEM). The results of this study imply that the application of a multivariate analysis model to evaluate the effectiveness of communication journalism on Vietnam’s public administrative reform policies in particular and policy communication in general is appropriate.

Keywords

Research model; Communication; Policy; Journalism; Information

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] T. T. H. Ha, “The role of policy communication in government performance in different countries,” Research Journal of Ministry of Home Affairs, February 24, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://tcnn.vn/news/detail/49882/Vai-tro-cua-truyen-thong-chinh-sach-doi-voi-hoat-dong-cua-chinh-phu-o-cac-nuoc.html. [Accessed October 10, 2022].

[2] T. T. H. Ha, “Some solutions to improve the effectiveness of state administrative reform policy communication in the press,” State Management Magazine, February 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.quanlynhanuoc.vn/2021/02/04/mot-so-giai-phap-nang-cao-hieu-qua-truyen-thong-chinh-sach-cai-cach-hanh-chinh-nha-nuoc-tren-bao-chi/. [Accessed October 10, 2022].

[3] T. T. H. Ha, “Messages on policy communication through some studies in the world,” Online Journalist Magazine, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://nguoilambao.vn/thong-diep-truyen-thong-chinh-sach-qua-mot-so-nghien-cuu-tren-the-gioi-n54234.html. [Accessed October 10, 2022].

[4] M. Brunner and H. Süß, “Analyzing the Reliability of Multidimensional Measures: An Example from Intelligence Research,” 2005. [Online]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? doi=10.1.1.856.4612&rep=rep1&type=pdf. [Accessed May 16, 2022].

[5] B. M. Byrne, A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer, 1989.

[6] M. W. Browne and R. Cudeck, “Alternative ways of assessing model fit,” in Testing structural equation models, K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, (Eds.), Newbury Park,CA: Sage, 1993, pp. 136–162.

[7] S. L. Crowley and X. Fan, “Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 508–531, 1997, doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_4.

[8] J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson, Multivariate data analysis, (7th ed.), Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010.

[9] C. A. Cerny and H. F. Kaiser, “A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 43-47, 1977.

[10] L. T. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-55, 1999, doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.

[11] F. H. Joseph, C. B. William, J. B. Barry, and E. A. Rolph, Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Edition. Pearson Education Limited, 2014.

[12] C. Nachtigall, U. Kroehne, F. Funke, and R. Steyer, “(Why) should we use SEM? Pros and cons of structural equation modeling,” Methods of Psychological Research Online, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-22, 2003.

[13] J. B. Ullman, “Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 35-50, 2006, doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.6945

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me