TƯƠNG TÁC CHIẾN LƯỢC TRONG CHI TIÊU CHÍNH PHỦ: BẰNG CHỨNG TỪ CHÍNH QUYỀN ĐỊA PHƯƠNG TẠI NHẬT BẢN
Thông tin bài báo
Ngày nhận bài: 16/04/21                Ngày hoàn thiện: 29/05/21                Ngày đăng: 31/05/21Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Toàn văn:
PDF (English)Tài liệu tham khảo
[1] A. C. Case, H. S. Rosen and J. R. Hines, “Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence. Evidence from the states,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 285–307, doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(93)90036-S.
[2] J. A. Granado, J. Martinez-Vazquez, and R. R. Simatupang, “Local government fiscal competition in developing countries: The case of Indonesia,” Urban Public Economics review, no. 8, pp.13-45, 2008.
[3] D. Bartolini and R. Santolini, “Political yardstick competition among Italian municipalities on spending decisions,” The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 49, pp. 213-235, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s00168-011-0437-5.
[4] J. Lundberg, “Spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services,” Regional Studies, vol. 40, pp. 631-644, 2006.
[5] J. Gu, “Spatial dynamics and determinants of county-level education expenditure in China,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 617–634, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12564-012-9224-y.
[6] Š. Lenka, “Spatial Interdependence of Local Public Expenditures: Selected Evidence from the Czech Republic,” Czech Economic Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 07 - 25, 2009.
[7] J. Wang, “Strategic interaction and economic development incentives policy: Evidence from U.S. States,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 68, pp. 249–259, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.11.007.
[8] S. Gibbons and H. G. Overman, “Mostly Pointless Spatial Econometrics?” SERC Discussion Papers 61, UK Spatial Economics Research Centre, 2010.
[9] T. Lyytikainen, “Tax competition among local governments: Evidence from a property tax reform in Finland,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 96, pp. 584-595, 2012.
[10] F. M. Fossen, L. Mergele, and N. Pardo, “Fueling fiscal interactions: Commodity price shocks and local government spending in Columbia,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 24, pp. 616-651, 2017.
[11] T. Miyazaki and M. Sato, “Empirical studies on strategic interaction among municipality governments over disaster waste after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 44, pp. 26-38, 2017.
[12] H. H. Kelejian and I. R. Prucha, “A generalized two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive disturbances,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 17, no.1, pp. 99–121, 1998.
[13] H. H. Kelejian and I. R. Prucha, “Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 157, pp. 53–67, 2010.
[14] I. Arraiz, D. M. Drukker, H. H. Kelejian, and I. R. Prucha, “A spatial Cliff-Ord-type
model with heteroskedastic innovations: Small and large sample results,” Journal of Regional Sciences, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 592–614, 2010.
[15] M. Hayashi and W. Yamamoto, “Information sharing, neighborhood demarcation, and yardstick competition: an empirical analysis of intergovernmental expenditure interaction in Japan,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 134–163, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10797-016-9413-4.
[16] S. Kim and S. Park, “Are spending patterns of local government independent? Strategic interactions of U.S. local governments in California,” Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 121-137, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.4374
Các bài báo tham chiếu
- Hiện tại không có bài báo tham chiếu