COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF A3 AND Z3 PARALLEL ROBOT STYLE SUPPORT STRUCTURES TO EXPAND THE TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES OF MILLING MACHINE | Nhung | TNU Journal of Science and Technology

COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF A3 AND Z3 PARALLEL ROBOT STYLE SUPPORT STRUCTURES TO EXPAND THE TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES OF MILLING MACHINE

About this article

Received: 07/08/24                Revised: 07/10/24                Published: 08/10/24

Authors

1. Nguyen Thi Trang Nhung Email to author, TNU - University of Technology
2. Pham Thanh Long, TNU - University of Technology

Abstract


Three-axis CNC numerical control machine tools often have limited capabilities when machining three-dimensional surfaces. In this case, the kinematic chain is often extended using a fixture that has the structure of a parallel robot, called hybrid machine tools. In fact, when choosing this extension fixture, there may be more than one choice and comparing the suitability between candidates according to a series of different criteria to choose the optimal solution is often not simple.By researching and comparing two commonly used structures in industry, A3 and Z3, this paper proposes a solution to compare criteria related to pressure transmission angle. On that basis, the most suitable support structure to expand the technological capabilities of the milling machine can be selected. Through research, it was found that in the same control space, the A3 head outperforms the common Sprint Z3 head, being the better choice in this case. The proposed method is a suitable tool to support decision making in similar cases.

Keywords


Parallel robot; A3; Z3; Pressure transmission angle; Comparison and selection

References


[1] W. Du, Q. Bai, and B. Zhang, “A Novel Method for Additive/Subtractive Hybrid Manufacturing of Metallic Parts,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 5, pp. 1018-1030, 2016.

[2] T. Yamazaki, “Development of A Hybrid Multi-tasking Machine Tool: Integration of Additive Manufacturing Technology with CNC Machining,” Proc. CIRP, vol. 42, pp. 81-86, 2016.

[3] J. M. Flynn, A. Shokrani, S. T. Newman, and V. Dhokia, “Hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools - Research and industrial developments,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 101, pp. 79-101, 2016.

[4] DMG Mori, “Lasertec 65 3D Hybrid,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://en.dmgmori.com/products/ machines/advanced-technology/additive-manufacturing/powder-nozzle/lasertec-65-3d-hybrid. [Accessed July 8, 2024].

[5] Mazak, “Hybrid Multi-Tasking Machine—AM,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mazakeu.co. uk/machines-technology/technology/hybrid-multi-tasking-machine/. [Accessed July 8, 2024].

[6] M. Cortina, J. I. Arrizubieta, J. E. Ruiz, E. Ukar, and A. Lamikiz, “Latest Developments in Industrial Hybrid Machine Tools that Combine Additive and Subtractive Operations,” Materials, vol. 11, 2018, Art. no. 2583, doi:10.3390/ma11122583.

[7] F. Xie, X. J. Liu, and X. Luo, “Optimal design of a novel 4-degree-of-freedom parallel mechanism with flexible orientation capability,” Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 233, September 2017, doi: 10.1177/0954405417731469.

[8] X. Chen, X. J. Liu, F. G. Xie, and T. Sun, “A Comparison Study on Motion/Force Transmissibility of Two Typical 3-DOF Parallel Manipulators: The Sprint Z3 and A3 Tool Heads,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 11, 2014, doi: 10.5772/57458.

[9] A. Rosyid, B. E. Khasawneh, and A. Alazzam, “Review article: Performance measures of parallel kinematics manipulators,” Mech. Sci., vol. 11, pp. 49-73, 2020, doi: 10.5194/ms-11-49-2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.10893

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
TNU Journal of Science and Technology
Rooms 408, 409 - Administration Building - Thai Nguyen University
Tan Thinh Ward - Thai Nguyen City
Phone: (+84) 208 3840 288 - E-mail: jst@tnu.edu.vn
Based on Open Journal Systems
©2018 All Rights Reserved