Email this article EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING INSTRUCTION FROM EFL STUDENTS‘ PERSPECTIVES
About this article
Received: 14/01/25 Revised: 27/03/25 Published: 28/03/25Authors
Nguyen Thi Ngan
, Nha Trang University
Abstract
Feedback plays a crucial role in the development of second language writing skills. This study investigates the experiences of English major students at a university in Vietnam with feedback from writing classes. It aims to seek a better understanding of various types of feedback that students receive in their writing courses, assessing their quality, effectiveness, and how they align with students' needs and expectations. Surveys of 101 students following up by in-depth interviews with 10 informants who are juniors and seniors of the English major at a university were designed to collect data. Findings revealed a strong preference for more targeted, detailed, personalized teacher feedback while acknowledging the value of feedback from other sources such as peers or AI tools. They also proposed the implementation of more state-of-the art feedback delivery schemes, emphasizing the importance of incorporating tools such as digital platforms, real-time feedback systems, and AI-driven solutions that allow for more personalized, efficient and interactive dialogues. Providing feedback tailored to students’ expectations can greatly enhance their effectiveness and contribute to the overall success of L2 writing instruction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] J. Hattie and G. Yates, Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London: Routledge, 2014.
[2] M. Long, “The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition,” In R. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Edward Arnold, 1996, 413–468.
[3] K. Hyland and F. Hyland, (eds.) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
[4] J. Harmer, The practice of English language teaching (5th edition). England: Pearson Education Ltd, 2015.
[5] D. R. Ferris, Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003, doi: 10.4324/9781410607201.
[6] R. Niu, P. Shan, and X. You, “Complementation of multiple sources of feedback in EFL learners’ writing,” Assessing Writing, vol. 49, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100549.
[7] A. Huynh, “A Vietnamese tertiary EFL students’ practices on self-assessment in writing skill,” Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 132, no. 6B, 2023, doi: 10.26459/hueunijssh.v132i6B.7232.
[8] J. Liu and J. Hansen, Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 2002.
[9] H. Meihami and Z. Varmaghani, “The implementation of self-assessment in EFL writing classroom: An experimental study,” International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 39-48, 2013, doi: 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.9.39
[10] M. Yang, R. Badger, and Y. Zhen, “A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 179-200, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.
[11] S. Yun and I. Lee, “Peer feedback in second language writing,” Language Teaching, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 461-493, 2016.
[12] E. C. Berg, “The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 215-241, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80111-7.
[13] K. Eriksson, J. Lindvall, O. Helenius, and A. Ryve, “Cultural variation in the effectiveness of feedback on students’ mistakes,” Educational Psychology, vol. 10, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03053.
[14] B. Harks, et al., “The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness,” Educational Psychology, vol. 34, pp. 269-290, 2014, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.785384.
[15] J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The power of feedback,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 1, no. 77, pp. 81-112, 2007, doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.11891
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.