ON THE STABILITY OF PREDICTOR-CORRECTOR METHODS BETWEEN ADAMS AND BACKWARD DIFFERENCE FORMULA | Tiệp | TNU Journal of Science and Technology

ON THE STABILITY OF PREDICTOR-CORRECTOR METHODS BETWEEN ADAMS AND BACKWARD DIFFERENCE FORMULA

About this article

Received: 13/05/20                Revised: 20/08/20                Published: 27/08/20

Authors

1. Dinh Van Tiep, TNU - University of Technology
2. Pham Thi Thu Hang Email to author, TNU - University of Technology

Abstract


The predictor-corrector methods take the upper hand in decreasing the number of function evaluations and of derivative evaluations as well comparing to the Runger-Kutta methods and various linear multistep methods. The stability however is a traditional disease of a high order method. This problem is also the case to the predictor-corrector method. The paper discusses on the matter of stability of the k-step Adams predictor-correct method and that of the predictor-corrector methods constructed on the basis of k-step Adams-Brashfort for the predictor and the k-step or (k+1)-step backward difference formula (BDF) for the corrector with low k, say . The reason to consider the BDF corrector is from the fact of having a large portion of the absolute stability region for those methods (with ) competing to other Adams-Moulton correctors. Some awkward performances of the predictor-corrector to the stiffness are also discussed and a modified algorithm is also developed to treat the poor performance of the abovementioned methods. The main contribution of the paper is the strategy of depicting the absolute stability region of a predictor-corrector method by constructing its stability polynomial on the basis of the recurrence equation obtain form the pair of difference equations describing the predictor and corrector. On that construction, we can be able to sketch the region by the boundary locus method.


Keywords


linear multistep method; k-step Adams predictor-corrector; backward difference formula; stiffness; absolute stability region.

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1]. J. C. Butcher, Numerical Method for Ordinary Differential Equations. 2nd edition, John-Wiley & Sons, 2008.

[2]. E. S , D. Mayers, and Barsky, An introduction to Numerical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

[3]. M. L.Ghrist, B. Fornberg, and J. A. Reeger, “Stability ordinates of Adams predictor-corrector methods,” Bit Numer Math, vol. 55, pp. 733-750, 2015.

[4]. Li, D. Zhang, W. Chengjian, W. Zhang, and Yangjing, “Implicit–explicit predictor–corrector schemes for nonlinear parabolic differential equations,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2711-2722, 2011.

[5]. M. A. Jankowska, M. Hoffmann, and Tomasz, “On interval predictor-corrector methods,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 75, pp. 777-808, 2017.

[6]. R. L. Burden, and J. D. Faires, Numerical Analysis, 9th edition, Brooks/Cole, 2010.

[7]. E. Issacson, and H. B. Keller, Analysis of numerical methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1966.

[8]. R. J. LeVeque, Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations: steady-state and time-dependent problems. SIAM, Philadelphia, 2007.

[9]. P. J. Van Der Houwen, and B. P. Sommeijer, “Predictor-Corrector Method with Improved Absolute Stability Region,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Academic Press Inc, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 417-437, 1983.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.3122

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
TNU Journal of Science and Technology
Rooms 408, 409 - Administration Building - Thai Nguyen University
Tan Thinh Ward - Thai Nguyen City
Phone: (+84) 208 3840 288 - E-mail: jst@tnu.edu.vn
Based on Open Journal Systems
©2018 All Rights Reserved