CORRELATION BETWEEN ROOT DEVELOPMENT AND RICE GROWTH (KD18) UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES
About this article
Received: 11/06/20                Revised: 30/07/20                Published: 31/07/20Abstract
Study on growth and development of rice under the influence of different irrigation regimes arranged in greenhouse conditions at Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry. The experiment was conducted on Khang Dan 18 rice variety with 5 different irrigation treatments, including flooded treatment during cultivation (F1); alternate between dry and wet every 4 days (F2), 8 days (F3), 12 days (F4) and 16 days (F5). The results show that the irrigating regime significantly affects the growth of rice such as number of branches, plant height, dry mass, leaves and roots. The best growth of rice is at the 4-day alternating between dry and wet, which has 24.2 - 36.9% higher growth rate than the other treatments. Growth factors, such as leaf stem weight, are strongly correlated with root parameters at tillering, dough and maturity. The root parameters are positively correlated with the growth of stems and leaves in the flowering and maturing stage. The higher number of roots significantly leads to the larger root mass, leaf, stem, and total dry matter weight with a confidence level of 95% or more (P <0.05). In order for the rice to grow well, it is necessary to manage irrigation for the best root development especially in the main stages such as tillering, panicle initiation, heading, grain filling, and ripening.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1]. T. K. Bridgit and N. N. Potty, “Effect of cultural management of root characteristics and productivity of rice in laterite soil,” Journal of Tropical Agricultural, vol. 40. pp. 59-62, 2002.
[2]. M. Khairi, M. Nozulaidi, A. Afifah and Md. S. Jahan, “Effect of various water regimes on rice production in lowland irrigation,” Australian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 9, pp.153-159, 2015.
[3]. H. H. Dang and V. P. Hoang, “Correlation between root with the yield of rice (KD18) under the influence of different water regimes,” TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 187, no. 11, pp. 43-50. 2018.
[4]. Y. Tsuno and Y. L. Wang, “Analyses on factors causing cultivar differences in the ripening process of rice cultivars,” Japanese Journal of Crop Science, vol. 57, pp. 119-131, 1988.
[5]. M. Osaki, T. Shinano, M. Matsumoto, T. Zheng and T. Tadano, “A root – shoot interaction hypothesis for high productivitiy of field crops,” Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 43, pp. 1079-1084, 1997.
[6]. N. Nikolaos, M. Koukou and N. Karagiannidis, “Effects of various rootstocks on xylem exudates cytokinin content, nutrient uptake and growth patterns of grapevine Vitis vinnifera L. cv. Thompson seedless,” Agronomie, vol. 20, pp. 363-373, 2000.
[7]. J. C. Yang, “Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and the nutrient absorption and utilization,” Sci. Agr. Sinica, vol. 44, pp. 36–46, 2011.
[8]. M. Toorchi, H. E. Shashidhar and H. Sridhara, “Influence of the Root System on Grain Yield and Related Characters in Rainfed Lowland Rice (Oryza sativa L.),” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 2267-2272, 2006.
[9]. M. C. Champoux, S. Sarkarung, D. Mackill, J. C. O. Toole, N. Huang and S. R. Mccouch, “Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers,” Theor. Applied Genet, vol. 90, pp. 969-981, 1995.
[10]. International Rice Research Institute, Standard Evaluation System for Rice. IRRI, 5th edition, 2013.
[11]. A. K. Thakur, S. Rath and K. G. Mandal, “Differential responses of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional flooded – rice management methods to applications of nitrogen fertilizer,” Plant Soil, vol. 370, pp. 59-71, 2013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.2020.08.3282
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.





