MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN TRAINING PROGRAM: A CASE STUDY IN VIETNAM HUNGARY INDUSTRIAL UNIVERSITY
About this article
Published: 20/08/18Abstract
This study was focused on analysing and exploring the relationship between management practices in the training program and employer expectation in Viet-Hungary University. This research used a survey for collecting data from 500 respondents namely: employers, students and school members. This study also evaluated the impact of nine factors on management practices as Objectives and Tasks, Recruitments, Teaching and learning activities, Quality of teachers, Curricula, Library Facilities, Facilities for teaching activities, Financial management, and Service for trainees on employer’ expectation. The results showed considerable different evaluations of the three groups. The employers claimed that the university had to enhance the factors that affect graduates’ performance. While Students argued that they need more activities indoor and outdoor classroom, and required teachers to transfer knowledge and real experience in their lessons. However, university members claimed that almost all factors were suitable for students. Additionally, the result of regression pointed out that the four factors as recruitments, curricular, objectives and financial factors were not significant at 5% levels of significance that impeded the employers’ demand. It means that recruitments, curricular, objectives and financial factors did not significantly impede the employers’ expectation. Therefore, universities should continue to guarantee the remaining factors and focused on skills, knowledge, ability and attitude of students.
Keywords
References
1. Gauld, D., & Miller, P. (2004). The qualifications and competencies held by effective workplace trainers. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28(1), 8-22.
2. Massey, W. (2003). Access to what? Putting quality into national QA systems. Paper presented at the international network for quality assurance agencies in higher education. (INQAAHE) conference, Dublin, March 2003.
3. Noe, A.R., Hollanbeck, R.J., Gerhart, B. and Wright, P.M. (2003). Human resource management (3rd Ed) USA: McGraw-Hill.
4. Monfared, N. (2007). Analysis of factors affecting on successful implementation of agricultural operations by agricultural students. Journal of Construction and Education, 4(4), 2–11
5. Brown, T.C., and McCracken, M. (2009). Building a bridge of understanding; how barriers to training participation become barriers to training transfer. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(6), 492-512.
6. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2006). How to conduct productive meetings: Strategies, tips, and tools to ensure your next meeting is well planned and effective. American Society for Training and Development.
7. Storr, L., and Hurst, K. (2001). Developing a quality assurance framework for in-service training and development. Quality Assurance in Education, 9 (3), 132-138.
8. Bimpitsos, C., & Petridou, E. (2012). A transdisciplinary approach to training: preliminary research findings based on a case analysis. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(9), 911-929.
9. Carliner, S. (2003). Training design basics. American Society for training and Development. MD, USA
10. Charney, C., and Conway, K. (2005). The trainers tool kit. American Management Association, AMACOM. USA.
11. Casio, W. F. (2000). Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western. Quoted in Manju, S & Dr. Suresh BH (2011), Training Design Interventions and Implications for the productivity Effectiveness, Synergy, 9(1), 52-68.
12. Dowling, P., & Welch, D. (2005). International Human Resource Management: Managing People in a Multinational Context. Manson: Thomson South-Western.
13. Luthans, F., Stajkovic, A.D., (1999). Reinforce for performance: the need to go beyond pay and even reward. Academy of Management Executive 13, 49–57.
14. Thompson, L.L. (2004). Making the team: A guide for managers. (2nd Ed). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
15. Owusu-Ansah, W. & Poku, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship education, a panacea to graduate unemployment in Ghana? International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(15), 211-220
16. Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing bulletin, 2(1), pp. 66-70.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.





