Email this article ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING KNOWLEDGE SHARING BEHAVIORS OF LECTURERS OF DONG THAP UNIVERSITY
About this article
Received: 17/11/21 Revised: 11/12/21 Published: 11/12/21Authors
1. Huynh Quoc Tuan
, Dong Thap University2. Nguyen Giac Tri, Dong Thap University
3. Duong Thi Huynh Nhu, An Giang University
Abstract
The study aims to examine the factors affecting the knowledge sharing behavior of lecturers at Dong Thap University. To conduct this research, the authors conducted depth interviews with 07 lecturers working in training departments to adjust the scale. On the basis of the adjusted scale, the author has developed a formal questionnaire and then sent it to 272 lecturers working in training departments for quantitative research stage. To achieve the research goal, the method of data analysis chosen by the authors is to evaluate the structural equation model according to the partial least squares method through the evaluation of the measurement model and the structural model with the support of SmartPLS 3.0 tool. Research results have shown that there are 04 factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior of Dong Thap University lecturers, including: trust, reward system, organizational culture and information technology, in which information technology is the factor that has the strongest influence on knowledge sharing behavior of lecturers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Tiếng Việt)References
[1] O. W. Bello and R. A. Oyekunle, “Attitude, perceptions and motivation towards knowledge sharing: Views from universities in kwara state, Nigeria,” African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2014.
[2] C. Chyi Lee and J. Yang, “Knowledge value chain,” Journal of Management Development, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 783–794, 2000.
[3] K. Seonghee and J. Boryung, “An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution,” Library and Information Science Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 282–290, 2008.
[4] T. T. Bui, “Factors affecting the behavior of knowledge sharing with colleagues of lecturers in universities,” Journal of Economics & Development, vol. 199, pp. 71–79, 2014.
[5] Q. T. Nguyen and T. P. Bui, “Factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior of lecturers at Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology,” Industry and Trade Magazine, vol. 7, pp. 139–143, 2019.
[6] N. T. Tran, “Factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior of lecturers: The case of public universities,” Management Science Letters, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 2789–2798, 2020.
[7] J. Javaid, S. Soroya, and K. Mahmood, “Impact of personal and organizational factors on knowledge sharing attitude of university teachers in Pakistan,” Electronic Library, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 317–336, 2020.
[8] C. M. Chiu, M. H. Hsu, and E. T. G. Wang, “Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1872–1888, 2006.
[9] T. H. P. Do, T. H. Chu, T. G. Nguyen, and X. L. Duong, “Investigating the effects of social capital and information technology on knowledge sharing intention and knowledge sharing behavior among employees in Thai Nguyen university,” TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2017.
[10] N. T. Tran and K. M. Tu, “Factors affecting knowledge sharing behaviors of teachers in the concerns of the covid-19 pandemic: a case study of public university in ho chi minh city,” Industry and Trade Magazine, vol. 18, pp. 224–229, 2021.
[11] Q. H. Nguyen, “Knowledge sharing: The key in Knowledge Management at Universities in the innovation period,” Industry and Trade Magazine, vol. 10, pp. 207–213, 2018.
[12] N. T. Tran, “Factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior with colleagues of An Giang University lecturers,” Economy & Forecast Review, vol. 2, pp. 64–67, 2020.
[13] C. E. Connelly and E. Kevin Kelloway, “Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 294–301, 2003.
[14] J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 411–423, 1988.
[15] W. W. Chin, R. A. Peterson, and S. P. Brown, “Structural equation modeling in marketing: Some practical reminders,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 287–298, 2008.
[16] V. A. Nguyen and T. P. T. Nguyen, “The applying of american customer satisfaction index in Vietnam – a case in mobile phone service,” Asian Journal of Economics and Business Studies, vol. 30, pp. 0–23, 2019.
[17] J. J. F. Hair, G. Tomas, M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2014.
[18] C. Fornell and D. F.Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.5268
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.