PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF RPL ROUTING PROTOCOL  WITH DIFFERENT OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS

Vũ Chiến Thắng; Nguyễn Thị Thanh Bình

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.5518

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF RPL ROUTING PROTOCOL WITH DIFFERENT OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS

About this article

Received: 09/02/22 Revised: 25/04/22 Published: 26/04/22

Authors

1. Vu Chien Thang , TNU - University of Information and Communication Technology
2. Nguyen Thi Thanh Binh, Thai Nguyen University

Abstract

Nowadays, we stand before the digital revolution of the 21st century: smart objects are interconnected and connected to the Internet. It is predicted that the number of smart objects will reach billions of devices in the next 10 years. Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) proposed by the RoLL working group is a multi-hop routing protocol used for smart objects networks. In the RPL protocol, an objective function specifies parent selection and route construction based on routing metrics. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of the RPL routing protocol using two objective functions that are MRHOF and OF0. We use the Cooja tool to simulate and evaluate network performance. The evaluation results show that MRHOF performs better than OF0 in terms of average power consumption, successful data delivery ratio, and adaptive change in the network. In the poor quality of the transmission medium condition, MRHOF achieves significantly better performance than OF0.

Keywords

RPL routing protocol; Performance Evaluation; Smart Objects Networks; MRHOF; OF0

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] J. -P. Vasseur and A. Dunkels, Interconnecting Smart Object with IP: The Next Internet, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2010.

[2] J. Haase, G. Zucker, and M. Alahmad, “Energy Efficient Building Automation: A survey paper on approaches and technologies for optimized building operation,” in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Nov. 2014, pp. 5350-5356.

[3] K. Agarwal, A. Agarwal, and G. Misra, “Review and Performance Analysis on Wireless Smart Home and Home Automation using IoT,” in Proceedings of the Third International conference on I-SMAC, Dec. 2019, pp. 629-633.

[4] K. Begum and S. Dixit, “Industrial WSN using IoT: A survey,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT 2016), March 2016, pp. 499-504.

[5] S. Sidid and S. Gaur, “Smart Grid Building Automation based on Internet of Things,” in Proceedings of the 2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), April 2017, pp. 1-4.

[6] S. Gera, M. Mridul, and S. Sharma, “IoT based Automated Health Care Monitoring System for Smart City,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), April 2021, pp. 364-368.

[7] T. Tsvetkov, RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks, Seminar SN SS2011 : Network Architectures and Services, July 2011.

[8] J. Vasseur, M. Kim, K. Pister, N. Dejean, and D. Barthel, Routing Metrics used for Path Calculation in Low Power and Lossy Networks, IETF RFC 6551, March, 2012.

[9] O. Gnawali and P. Levis, The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function, RFC 6719, Sep. 2012.

[10] P. Thubert, Ed., Objective Function Zero for the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks, RFC6552, March 2012.

[11] F. Österlind, A. Dunkels, J. Eriksson, N. Finne, and T. Voigt, “Cross-level Sensor Network Simulation with Cooja,” in Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Practical Issues in Building Sensor Network Applications, Tampa, Florida, USA, 2006, pp. 641-648.

[12] C. T. Vu and N. T. Le, “Performance Evaluation of IPv6 Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network,” Journal of Military Science and Technology, vol. 38, pp. 51-58, 2015.

[13] N. Tsiftes, J. Eriksson, and A. Dunkels, “Low-Power Wireless IPv6 Routing with ContikiRPL,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (ACM/IEEE IPSN), Stockholm, Sweden, 2010, pp. 406-407.

[14] D. De Couto, D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, and R. Morris, “A High-throughput Path Metric for Multi-hop Wireless Routing,” in Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, New York, 2003, pp. 134-146.

[15] T. Winter, P. Thubert, A. Brandt, T. Clausen, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, and J. Vasseur, RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks, IETF RFC 6550, March, 2012.

[16] A. Boukerche, Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks, John Wiley & Sons Inc., ISBN: 9780470396360, 2008.

[17] A. Dunkels, The ContikiMAC Radio Duty Cycling Protocol, SICS technical report, December 2011.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.5518

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me