REMOVING ACID ORANGE 7 DYE FROM WASTEWATER BY  MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR): EFFECT OF AERATION MODE AND HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME

Lưu Tuấn Dương; Lê Thanh Sơn; Đặng Thị Thơm; Hoàng Mạnh Trung; Đỗ Xuân Trường; Đào Phương Uyên; Nguyễn Anh Dũng; Nguyễn Quang Phúc; Lê Cao Khải

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.8863

REMOVING ACID ORANGE 7 DYE FROM WASTEWATER BY MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR): EFFECT OF AERATION MODE AND HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME

About this article

Received: 29/09/23 Revised: 03/11/23 Published: 03/11/23

Authors

1. Luu Tuan Duong, TNU - University of Science
2. Le Thanh Son , Insitute of Environmental Technology - Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology
3. Dang Thi Thom, Insitute of Environmental Technology - Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology
4. Hoang Manh Trung, Global Technology-Telecommunication Corporation
5. Do Xuan Truong, Hanoi University of Science and Technology
6. Dao Phuong Uyen, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
7. Nguyen Anh Dung, Department of Science and Technology- Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment,
8. Nguyen Quang Phuc, Graduate University of Science and Technology
9. Le Cao Khai, Hanoi Pedagogical University No2

Abstract

A submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR, volume of 45 L) using microfiltration hollow fiber membrane with a pore size of 0.3 µm was studied to treat COD and acid orange 7 (AO7) dye of wastewater pretreated by an ozonation process. The results show that the aeration/ non aeration time and hydraulic retention time directly affected the efficiency of COD and AO7 dye treatment. When the aeration time increased, the efficiency of COD treatment improved while the AO7 dye treatment efficiency decreased; when the hydraulic retention time was extended from 12h to 18h, the COD and AO7 dye treatment efficiency both increased, but at 24h, the COD and AO7 dye treatment efficiency was almost unchanged. Therefore, the aeration/ non aeration time of 60 min/60 min, hydraulic retention time of 18h were the optimal operating conditions for this laboratory scale MBR, then the COD and AO7 dye treatment efficiency were reached 94.7% and 83.6%, respectively.

Keywords

Wastewater; Dye; Post-treatment; Acid orange 7; MBR

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] J. Dasgupta, J. Sikder, S. Chakraborty, S. Curcio, and E. Drioli, “Remediation of textile effluents by membrane based treatment techniques: A state of the art review,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 147, pp. 55–72, 2015.

[2] A. K. Verma, R. R. Dash, and P. Bhunia, “A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 93, pp. 154-168, 2012.

[3] CPCB, Advanced Methods for Treatment of Textile Industry Effluents, Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi, 2007.

[4] F. Duarte, V. Morais, F. J. Maldonado-Hodar, and L. M. Madeira, “Treatment of textile effluents by the heterogeneous Fenton process in a continuous packed-bed reactor using Fe/activated carbon as catalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 232, pp. 34-41, 2013.

[5] Q. Wang, Z. Luan, N. Wei, J. Li, and C. Liu, “The color removal of dye wastewater by magnesium chloride/red mud (MRM) from aqueous solution,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 170, pp. 690-698, 2009.

[6] N. M. H. ElDefrawy and H. F. Shaalan, “Integrated membrane solutions for green textile industries,” Desalination, vol. 204, pp. 241-254, 2007.

[7] I. Arslan-Alaton, B. H. Gursoy, and J. E. Schmidt, “Advanced oxidation of acid and reactive dyes: effect of Fenton treatment on aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic processes,” Dyes Pigments, vol. 78, pp. 117-130, 2008.

[8] R. Ennouri, M. Panizza, T. Mhiri, and S. C. Elaoud, “Electrochemical behaviour of acid orange 7 by cyclic voltammetry in different solvents,” Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 269–277, 2017.

[9] B. Naraghi, F. Zabihi, M. R. Narooie, M. Saeidi, and H. Biglari, “Removal of acid orange 7 dye from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto Kenya tea pulps; granulated shape,” Electron Physician, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 4312–4321, 2017.

[10] V. K. Gupta, A. Mittal, V. Gajbe, and J. Mittal, “Removal and Recovery of the Hazardous Azo Dye Acid Orange 7 through Adsorption over Waste Materials: Bottom Ash and De-Oiled Soya,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1446–1453, 2006.

[11] D. Sannino, N. Morante, O. Sacco, A. Mancuso, L. De Guglielmo, G. Di Capua, N. Femia, and V. Vaiano, “Visible light-driven degradation of Acid Orange 7 by light modulation techniques,” Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 185–193, 2023.

[12] C. K. Lim, H. H. Bay, A. Aris, Z. Abdul Majid, and Z. Ibrahim, “Biosorption and biodegradation of Acid Orange 7 by Enterococcus faecalis strain ZL: optimization by response surface methodological approach,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 5056-5066, 2013.

[13] M. Yan, H. Xie, Q. Zhang, H. Qu, J. Shen, and J. Kong, “Hemin Based Biomimetic Oxidative Degradation of Acid Orange 7,” Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, vol.4, no. 6, pp. 26 – 34, 2016.

[14] Y. Lau , Y. S. Wong, T. T. Teng, N. Morad, M. Rafatullah, and S. Ong, “Coagulation-flocculation of azo dye Acid Orange 7 with green refined laterite soil,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 246, pp. 383-390, 2014.

[15] A. C. Gomes, I. C. Gonçalves, and M. N. de Pinho, “The role of adsorption on nanofiltration of azo dyes,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 255, no. 1–2, pp. 157-165, 2005.

[16] J. Hoigne, “Inter-calibration of OH radical sources and water quality parameters,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1-8, 1997.

[17] J. Lobos, C. Wisniewski, M. Heran, and A. Grasmick, “Membrane bioreactor performances: comparison between continuous and sequencing systems,” Desalination, vol. 199, pp. 319 - 321, 2006.

[18] F. Feng, Z. Xu, X. Li, W. You, and Y. Zhen, “Advanced treatment of dyeing wastewater towards reuse by the combined Fenton oxidation and membrane bioreactor process,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1657 – 1665, 2010.

[19] L. Rieger, I. Takács, and H. Siegrist, “Improving Nutrient Removal While Reducing Energy Use at Three Swiss WWTPs Using Advanced Control,” Water Environment Research, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 170 - 188, 2012

[20] O.T. Iorhemen, R.A. Hamza, and J.H. Tay, “Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology for Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation: Membrane Fouling,” Membranes (Basel), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 33, 2016.

[21] A. Yurtsever, E. Sahinkaya, Ö. Aktaş, D. Uçar, Ö. Çınar, and Z. Wang, “Performances of anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of synthetic textile wastewater,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 192, pp. 564-573, 2015.

[22] M. Isik, “Efficiency of simulated textile wastewater decolorization process based on the methanogenic activity of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in salt inhibition condition,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 35, pp. 399–404, 2004.

[23]D. Mendez–Paz, F. Omil, and J. M. Lema, “Anaerobic treatment of azo dye Acid Orange 7 under fedbatch and continuous conditions,” Water Research, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 771-778, 2005.

[24] E. Razo–Flores, B. A. Donlon, J. A. Field, and G. Lettinga, “Biodegradability of N–substituted aromatics and alkylphenols under methanogenic conditions using granuler sludge,” Water Science Technology, vol. 33, pp. 47-57, 1996.

[25] F. P. Van der Zee and S. Villaverde, “Combined anaerobic–aerobic treatment of azo dyes–A short review of bioreactor studies,” Water Research, vol. 39, pp.1425-1440, 2005.

[26] A. Gottlieb, C. Shaw, A. Smith, A. Wheatley, and S. Forsythe, “The toxicity of textile reactive azo dyes after hydrolysis and decolorization,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 49-56, 2003.

[27] N. C. G. Tan, A. Borger, P. Slender, A. V. Svitelskaya, G. Lettinga, and J. A. Field, “Degradation of azo dye Mordant Yellow 10 in a sequential anaerobic and bioaugmented aerobic reactor,” Water Science Technology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 337-344, 2000.

[28] M. Isýk and D. T. Sponza, “Simüle Tekstil Atýksuyunun Anaerobik/Aerobik Arýtýmý,” Ekoloji, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2004.

[29] Y. Wang, X. Huang, and Q. P. Yuan, “Nitrogen and carbon removals from food processing wastewater by an anoxic/aerobic membrane bioreactor,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1733–1739, 2005.

[30] J. Y. Tian, H. Liang, X. Li, S. J. You, S. Tian, and G. B. Li, “Membrane coagulation bioreactor (MCBR) for drinking water treatment,” Water Research, vol. 42, no. 14, pp. 3910–3920, 2008.

[31] A. H. Konsowa, H. B. Abd El-Rahman, and M. A. Moustaf, “Removal of azo dye acid orange 7 using aerobic membrane bioreactor,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 50, pp. 117–125, 2011.

[32] M. M. Zhang, C. Li, M. M. Benjamin, and Y. J. Chang, “Fouling and natural organic matter removal in adsorbent/membrane systems for drinking water treatment,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1663–1669, 2003.

[33] E. Drioli, G. Profio, and E. Curcio, “Hybrid membrane operations in water desalination and industrial processes rationalization,” Water Science & Technology, vol. 51, no. 6-7, pp. 293-304, 2005.

[34] M. Brik, P. Schoeberl, B. Chamam, R. Braun, and W. Fuchs, “Advanced treatment of textile wastewater towards reuse using a membrane bioreactor,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 41, pp. 1751–1757, 2006.

[35] R. Krull and E. Doepkens, “Recycling of dyehouse effluents by biological and chemical treatment,” Water Science & Technology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 311–317, 2004.

[36] C. Visvanathan, R. B. Aim, and K. Parameshwaran, “Membrane separation bioreactor for wastewater treatment,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 2000.

[37] X. Zhang and J. Liu, “Dyeing and printing wastewater treatment in a MBR with a gravity drain,” Desalination, vol. 190, pp. 277–286, 2006.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.8863

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me