CURRENT STATUS OF USE OF PROPHYLAMIC ANTIBIOTICS  IN PREGNANCY CAESAREAN SECTIONS  AT VINMEC PHU QUOC INTERNATIONAL GENERAL HOSPITAL

Tạ Quốc Bản; Nguyễn Thị Hồng; Phạm Thị Quỳnh Hoa

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.9018

CURRENT STATUS OF USE OF PROPHYLAMIC ANTIBIOTICS IN PREGNANCY CAESAREAN SECTIONS AT VINMEC PHU QUOC INTERNATIONAL GENERAL HOSPITAL

About this article

Received: 22/10/23 Revised: 29/11/23 Published: 30/11/23

Authors

1. Ta Quoc Ban , Vinmec Phu Quoc International Hospital; TNU - University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2. Nguyen Thi Hong, TNU - University of Medicine and Pharmacy
3. Pham Thi Quynh Hoa, TNU - University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Abstract

Currently, reducing surgical wound infections after cesarean section, in addition to hygiene and ensuring sterility during cesarean section, the use of prophylactic antibiotics (PA) is an effective measure. With the goal of describing the current situation of prophylactic antibiotic use in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section at Vinmec Phu Quoc International General Hospital from May 2021 - January 2023, we conducted research on 432 medical records of pregnant women receiving prophylactic antibiotic regimens during cesarean section at Vinmec Phu Quoc International General Hospital. Through descriptive cross-sectional research methods, we have obtained the following results: Mean age was 29.93 ± 4.88 years. Gestational age 37-41 weeks accounts for 95.8%. The rate of antibiotic used in surgery is Cefazolin accounts for 75.9%, Cefazolin + Azithromycin accounts for 24.1%. In the emergency cesarean section group, 51% used Cefazolin + Azithromycin, 49% used Cefazolin; in the program cesarean section group, 98.7% of cases used PA Cefazolin.

Keywords

Caesarean section; Prophylactic antibiotics; Gestational age; Emergency cesarean section; Planned cesarean section

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] L. H. Chuong, M. T. Dung et al., "Review on the current situation of cesarean section at the Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital in 2017," Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 92-96, 2018.

[2] M. T. Dung, N. D. Thang et al., "Analysis of factors related to indications for cesarean section surgery at the National Obstetrics Hospital in 2021," Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 46-49, 2022.

[3] S. Sharma and I. Dhakal, "Cesarean vs Vaginal Delivery: An Institutional Experience," JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, vol. 56, pp. 535-539, 2018.

[4] A. F. Kallianidis, J. M. Schutte, J. van Roosmalen, and T. van den Akker, "Maternal mortality after cesarean section in the Netherlands," Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol., vol. 229, pp. 148-152, 2018.

[5] T. Getaneh, A. Negesse, and G. Dessie, "Prevalence of surgical site infection and its associated factors after cesarean section in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis," BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 20, p. 311, 2020.

[6] S. I. Berríos-Torres et al., "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection," JAMA Surg, vol. 152, pp. 784-791, 2017.

[7] M. Uchino et al., "Efficacy of preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections in patients with Crohn disease: a randomized controlled trial," Annals of surgery, vol. 269, pp. 420-426, 2019.

[8] T. L. Laloto, D. H. Gemeda, and S. H. Abdella, "Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection in Ethiopia: prospective cohort," BMC Infect Dis., vol. 17, p. 119, 2017.

[9] D. Bayardorj, P. Promsatit, B. M. Chirangi, and E. Mahmoud, "Surgical Site Infections at Shirati KMT Hospital in Northeastern Tanzania," Cureus, vol. 15, 2023, Art. no. e34573.

[10] H. Cheng et al., "Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review," Surg Infect (Larchmt), vol. 18, pp. 722-735, 2017.

[11] A. G. Mekonnen and Y. M. Mittiku, "Surgical site infection and its association with rupture of membrane following cesarean section in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies," Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol, vol. 7, p. 2, 2021.

[12] A. Ata, J. Lee, S. L. Bestle, J. Desemone, and S. C. Stain, "Postoperative hyperglycemia and surgical site infection in general surgery patients," Arch Surg., vol. 145, pp. 858-864, 2010.

[13] A. Adane et al., "Predictors of surgical site infection among women following cesarean delivery in eastern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study," Ann Med Surg (Lond), vol. 85, pp. 738-745, 2023.

[14] T. H. Nguyen, "Analysis of the situation of antibiotic use in patients undergoing cesarean section surgery at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital A Thai Nguyen," Thesis of Level I Specialized Pharmacist, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, 2023.

[15] C. T. Bui, "Updating methods to minimize the risk of cesarean section infection," Reproductive Medicine, vol. 45, pp. 42-47, 2018.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.9018

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me