RESEARCH ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LEVEL: A CASE STUDY OF HAI PHONG AND QUANG NINH | Anh | TNU Journal of Science and Technology

RESEARCH ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LEVEL: A CASE STUDY OF HAI PHONG AND QUANG NINH

About this article

Received: 03/01/24                Revised: 25/03/24                Published: 25/03/24

Authors

1. Dao Vu Phuong Anh, University of Science - Vietnam National University, Hanoi
2. Pham Thi Thu Ha Email to author, University of Science - Vietnam National University, Hanoi
3. Nguyen Hung Cuong, University of Science - Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Abstract


The idea of sustainable development emerged several decades ago as a response to growing environmental problems related to inappropriate management of natural resources and increase in extreme weather phenomena, especially in developing countries. Using indicators is one of the best ways to monitor and measure progress towards sustainable development. In this article, we have presented the practical use of the Delphi technique and the Stable Prioritization Towards Ideal Solution (SPOTIS) method to in-depth assess the level of sustainable development of Hai Phong and Quang Ninh in the period 2016 - 2021. The research findings are as follows: First, the research build a sustainable development assessment system including 26 indicators that are compatible and have data available in accordance with the economic, social and environmental characteristics of the study area. Second, Hai Phong and Quang Ninh generally developed in a positive direction with sustainable development index (SDI) continuously increasing with increase of 1.07% and 1.09% respectively from 2016 to 2021. Third, the economic, social, and environmental aspects in both provinces developed unbalanced. The study recommends that it is vital to strengthen the policies to have a simultaneous development on the four dimensions of HDI, economy, society and environment to improve the SDI. Finally, based on research findings, the research indicators and methods can be put forward to assess the sustainable development level in other provinces and specific cases with similar characteristics.


Keywords


Sustainable development level; Hai Phong; Quang Ninh; Delphi technique; SPOTIS method

Full Text:

PDF

References


[1] R. Watson, J. Thwaites, D. Griggs, T. Kestin, and K. Mcgrath, “Sustainable development goals and targets for Australia: An interim proposal,” 2014. [Online]. Available: http://ap-unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/SDGs-for-Australia_Interim-Report.pdf. [Accessed April 8, 2020].

[2] V. Y Tran et al., “Establishing a sustainable development indicator set including economic, social, and environmental fields in Tay Nguyen provinces,” Vietnam J. Earth Sci., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 241–251, 2014, doi: 10.15625/0866-7187/36/3/5907.

[3] Hai Phong City People’s Committee (HPC), “Report on the socio-economic development, defense and security plan of Hai Phong city in 5 years 2016 - 2020,” 2015.

[4] Hai Phong City People’s Committee (HPC), “Report on evaluation of the results of the implementation of socio-economic development tasks for the five years 2016-2020 and the directions and tasks for socio-economic development for the five years 2021-2025,” 2021.

[5] P. T. Vo and M. T. T. Pham, “Assessment of sustainable development at local level in Ha Tinh province based on set of criteria,” J. For. Sci. Technol., no. 3, pp. 55–62, 2018.

[6] T. H. Le et al., “A system of sustainability indicators for the province of Thai Binh, Vietnam,” Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 661–679, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0315-x.

[7] T. H. Le, H. H. Pham, T. K. Nguyen, and L. Hens, “Indicators for Sustainable Development in the Quang Tri Province, Vietnam,” J. Hum. Ecol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 217–227, 2009, doi: 10.1080/09709274.2009.11906213.

[8] T. M. Lam, “Assessment of Sustainable Development Index for Thanh Hoa Province during Period from 2010-2014,” VNU J. Sci. Earth Environ., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 257–267, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://js.vnu.edu.vn/EES/article/view/4209. [Accessed September 16, 2021].

[9] D. Fink-Hafner, T. Dagen, M. Doušak, M. Novak, and M. Hafner-Fink, “Delphi Method: Strengths and Weaknesses,” Adv. Methodol. Stat., vol. 2, pp. 1–19, 2019, doi: 10.51936/fcfm6982.

[10] Hai Phong City Department of Natural Resources and Environment, “Report on Environmental Status of Hai Phong City for the period 2016-2020,” 2021.

[11] T. K. Ngo, “Cultural heritage conservation and sustainable urban,” Sci. J. Archit. Constr., vol. 46, pp. 92–96, 2022.

[12] OECD, Green Growth in Hai Phong, Viet Nam. 2016.

[13] Hai Phong City People’s Comittee(HPC), “City Master Plan to 2030 and vision to 2050,” 2022.

[14] D. B. Abraham and S. D. Iyer, “Introduction: Localizing SDGs and Empowering Cities and Communities in North America for Sustainability,” in Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in North American Cities Case Studies & Best Practices in the Science of Sustainability Indicators: Case Studies & Best Practices in the Science of Sustainability Indicators, D. B. Abraham and S. D. Iyer, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–6.

[15] J. Espey, “Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to the SDG Monitoring Challenge,” in Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in North American Cities: Case Studies Best Practices in the Science of Sustainability Indicators, D. B. Abraham and S. D. Iyer, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 87–96.

[16] Government’s Action Programme (GAP), “Politburo’s Resolution 30-NQ/TW on orientations for socio-economic development and defence - security safeguarding in the Red River Delta to 2030 with a vision to 2045,” 2023.

[17] R. C. Schmidt, "Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques," Decision Sciences, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 763-774, 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x.

[18] L. J. Cronbach, "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, vol. 16, pp. 297–334, 1951, doi: 10.1007/BF02310555.

[19] S. J. Paliwoda, “Predicting the Future Using Delphi,” Manag. Decis., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–38, Jan. 1983, doi: 10.1108/eb001309.

[20] P. Nasa, R. Jain, and D. Juneja, “Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness,” World J. Methodol., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 116–129, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.

[21] R. A. Green, “The Delphi Technique in Educational Research,” SAGE Open, vol. 4, no. 2, 2014, Art. no. 2158244014529773,doi: 10.1177/2158244014529773.

[22] E. E. Ameyaw, Y. Hu, M. Shan, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Le, “Application of Delphi method in construction engineering and management research: A quantitative perspective,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 991–1000, 2016, doi: 10.3846/13923730.2014.945953.

[23] H. D. Musa, M. R. Yacob, A. M. Abdullah, and M. Y. Ishak, “Delphi Method of Developing Environmental Well-being Indicators for the Evaluation of Urban Sustainability in Malaysia,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 30, pp. 244–249, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.044.

[24] A. T. Nguyen, H. T. T. Pham, T. K. Tran, et al., "Building indicators for trans-boundary natural resource management in the Cambodia–Laos–Vietnam Development Triangle Area based on experts’ opinion using Delphi method," Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04544-2.

[25] I. P. Sinha, R. L. Smyth, and P. R. Williamson, “Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies,” PLOS Med., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2011, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393.

[26] H. M. Donohoe and R. D. Needham, “Moving best practice forward: Delphi characteristics, advantages, potential problems, and solutions,” Int. J. Tour. Res., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 415–437, 2009, doi: 10.1002/jtr.709.

[27] J. Hugé, H. L. Trinh, P. H. Hai, J. Kuilman, and L. Hens, “Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanism projects in Vietnam,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 561–571, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10668-009-9211-6.

[28] G. Rowe and G. Wright, “The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis,” Int. J. Forecast., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 353–375, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.

[29] M. F. McBride et al., “Structured elicitation of expert judgments for threatened species assessment: A case study on a continental scale using email,” Methods Ecol. Evol., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 906–920, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00221.x.

[30] J. Dezert, A. Tchamova, D. Han, and J.-M. Tacnet, “The SPOTIS Rank Reversal Free Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Support,” in 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), 2020, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.23919/FUSION45008.2020.9190347.

[31] T. Parris and R. Kates, “Characterising and Measuring Sustainable Development,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., vol. 2813, pp. 1–1328, 2003, doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551.

[32] M. T. T. Nguyen, “Statistical research to assess sustainable development in Vietnam,” Master's Thesis, National Economics University, 2013.

[33] T. T. T. Tran, H. K. Pham, and H. M. Nguyen, “Assessing the impact of climate change on Ha Tu coal mine, Quang Ninh province,” J. Min. Earth Sci., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 17-25, 2022, doi: 10.46326/JMES.2021.63(3).03




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.9531

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
TNU Journal of Science and Technology
Rooms 408, 409 - Administration Building - Thai Nguyen University
Tan Thinh Ward - Thai Nguyen City
Phone: (+84) 208 3840 288 - E-mail: jst@tnu.edu.vn
Based on Open Journal Systems
©2018 All Rights Reserved