PHÂN TÍCH CÁC CUỘC TRANH LUẬN TỔNG THỐNG TRỰC TIẾP GIỮA DONALD TRUMP VÀ JOE BIDEN: MỘT NGHIÊN CỨU ĐIỂN HÌNH VỀ NGUYÊN TẮC CỘNG TÁC HỘI THOẠI CỦA GRICE
Thông tin bài báo
Ngày nhận bài: 26/03/24                Ngày hoàn thiện: 05/06/24                Ngày đăng: 05/06/24Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Toàn văn:
PDF (English)Tài liệu tham khảo
[1] History.com, “History,” March 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/kennedy-nixon-debates. [Accessed March 15, 2024].
[2] P. Grice, Logic and Conversation. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
[3] M. Hossain, “The Application of Grice Maxims in Conversation: A Pragmatic Study,” Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 32-40, 2021.
[4] Y. Joyce, “The Principles Underlying What is Communicated and not Said: A Cursory Discussion of Grice’s Cooperative Principle and its Maxims,” Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 10-17, 2021.
[5] K. E. Sidabutar and M. Johan, “Grice’s Types of maxims in ‘Willoughbhys’ Movie,” Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 326-337, 2022.
[6] A. Rasool, T. Zahra, and Z. Khawa, “An Investigation of Grice’s Cooperative Principle in an Interview with Ishaq Dar: A Pragmatic Analysis,” Kashmir Journal of Language Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-21, 2022.
[7] I. Al-Qaderi and A. Alduais, “The cooperative principle in political discourse: flouting Gricean maxims in Modern Standard Arabic political speeches,” Research Result, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 3-13, 2019.
[8] N. A. Laila, “Cooperative Principles in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Debate: Grice’s Maxims Analysis,” Applied Linguistics Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14-22, 2019.
[9] A. Benoit, “A Functional Analysis of the 2006 Canadian and 2007 Australian Election Debates,” Argumentation & Advocacy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 36-48, 2007.
[10] N. H. Kartika, A pragmatic analysis of Grice’s maxims in Clinton-Obama democrats presidential debate. Indonesia University of Education, Bandung, 2009.
[11] A. Khoirunisa and R. N. Indah, “Argumentative Statements in the 2016 Presidential Debates of the U.S: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” JEELS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155-173, 2017.
[12] N. Q. Nguyen and M. H. M. Sawalmeh, “Trump's Strategies in the First Presidential Debate: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 68-77, 2020.
[13] T. Sartika, “Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s and Joe Biden’s Language in Use in the 2020 United States Presidential Debates,” Conference proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Education of Suryankanacana, 2021, pp. 412-417.
[14] S. W. Vanderstoep and D. D. Johnston, Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
[15] Nytimes.com, “New York Times”. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000007365697/presidential-debate-live.html. [Accessed March 15, 2024].
[16] J . Cutting, Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge, 2002.
[17] J. Thomas, Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Routledge, 2013.
[18] businessinsider.com, “Business Insider,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.com /fact-check-of-first-trump-biden-2020-presidential-debate-live-2020-9. [Accessed March 15, 2024].
[19] A. Benoit and Harthcock, “Functions of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates,” Communication Monographs, vol. 66, pp. 341-357, 1999.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.9971
Các bài báo tham chiếu
- Hiện tại không có bài báo tham chiếu