ATTEMPTING TO UNDERSTAND SOME ARGUMENTS AT THE VIETNAMESE PARLIAMENT FROM THE APPROACH OF INTEGRATING LOGIC AND PRAGMATICS

Abstract

From the last years of the twentieth century until now, in the world, the argument is the main research object of many researchers from many sciences (logic, linguistics, philosophy ...) with many approaches. Each approach has its advantages. To thoroughly evaluate a practical argument requires a multidimensional approach. Therefore, the article raises the question of how to apply the view of integrating logic, pragmatics to consider arguments through a specific case (some arguments in the National Assembly of Vietnam). The paper uses qualitative research methods. By describing and analyzing discourse, the paper illustrates a method of assessing arguments in practice from a multidimensional perspective.