STUDY THE METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BORDER GATEWAY PROTOCOL ON IPV4 AND IPV6 INFRASTRUCTURE BY ANALYSIS AND EVALUATE OF SOME PROPERTIES AFFECTING PROTOCOL PERFORMANCE

Lê Hoàng Hiệp; Lê Xuân Hiếu

doi:10.34238/tnu-jst.4657

STUDY THE METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BORDER GATEWAY PROTOCOL ON IPV4 AND IPV6 INFRASTRUCTURE BY ANALYSIS AND EVALUATE OF SOME PROPERTIES AFFECTING PROTOCOL PERFORMANCE

About this article

Received: 14/06/21 Revised: 16/07/21 Published: 21/07/21

Authors

1. Le Hoang Hiep , TNU - University of Information and Communication Technology
2. Le Xuan Hieu, Thai Nguyen University

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on studying the performance of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) on IPv4 infrastructure compared to IPv6 infrastructure through analysis, experimental simulation and input evaluation, thereby giving recommendations quantitative results in terms of performance, performance, and advantages and disadvantages of the protocol on each individual network infrastructure. Methods of analysis, research and empirical evaluation of BGP used parameters such as: how to choose the path to the destination of the packet; traffic passing through the transmission line; response time and latency; packet loss rate. The research results show that on IPv6 network infrastructure, the BGP protocol works with superior performance and efficiency compared to IPv4 network infrastructure such as the size of BGP packets on IPv6 is higher, the traffic goes through the media is larger and delay is smaller. This will be useful information for designers, administrators and deployers of network infrastructure solutions using the most optimized and most effective BGP protocol in practice.

Keywords

Computer science; Routing Algorithm; Routing; BGP; Deployment of BGP

Full Text:

PDF (Tiếng Việt)

References

[1] P. Oppenheimer, Top-Down Network Design, Cisco Press, 2014.

[2] N. Kocharians and T. Vinson, CCIE Routing and Switching v5.0 Official Cert Guide, vol. 2, Fifth Edition, Pearson Education, 2014.

[3] N. Kocharians, CCIE Routing and Switching v5.1 Foundations: Bridging the Gap Between CCNP and CCIE, Pearson India, 2018.

[4] R. Zhang and M. Bartell, BGP Design and Implementation, Cisco Press, 2016.

[5] S. T. Chandel and S. Sharma, “Performance Evaluation of IPv4 and IPv6 Routing Protocols on Wired, Wireless and Hybrid Networks,” International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 57-62, 2016.

[6] L. H. Hiep et al., “Study the impacts of route summarization on the performance of OSPFv3 and EIGRPv6 in hybrid IPV4-IPV6 network,” Dalat University Journal of Science, vol. 6, pp. 77-89, 2019.

[7] T. D. Nguyen, H. H. Le, T. L. Pham, and D. M. Nguyen, “Network design of IPv6 safety based on analysis, feature assessment of IPv6 protocol,” TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 188, no. 12, pp. 85-91, 2018.

[8] H. H. Le et al., "Study the impacts of bandwidth and delay to performance of EIGRP in IPv4 and IPv6 network," TNU Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 204, no. 11, pp. 31-38, 2019.

[9] D. Chauhan and S. Sharma, “Performance Evaluation of Different Routing Protocols in IPv4 and IPv6 Networks on the basis of Packet Sizes,” Procedia computer science, vol. 46, pp. 1072-1078, 2015.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.4657

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.



Remember me